1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(86)80218-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of posterior sagittal anorectoplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Holschneider [12] reported 15.5% anal stenosis, 5% mucosal prolapse, and 7% relapse of anorectal or anovaginal fistula with 16.6% overall lethality in his series [12]. Other complications like temporary femoral nerve palsies, multiple rectocutaneous fistula, and posterior diverticulum comparable to a large anal crypt were also reported [13]. Sawicka [14] reported sacral bone defect in 10% of patients in his series of patients who underwent 1-stage repair with result of fecal continence defined as normal in 93% and good in 7% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Holschneider [12] reported 15.5% anal stenosis, 5% mucosal prolapse, and 7% relapse of anorectal or anovaginal fistula with 16.6% overall lethality in his series [12]. Other complications like temporary femoral nerve palsies, multiple rectocutaneous fistula, and posterior diverticulum comparable to a large anal crypt were also reported [13]. Sawicka [14] reported sacral bone defect in 10% of patients in his series of patients who underwent 1-stage repair with result of fecal continence defined as normal in 93% and good in 7% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The most frequent functional disorder encountered after treatment for imperforate anus in which the rectum has been preserved is constipation [26][27][28].…”
Section: • Functional Disorders ‫ؠ‬ Constipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, many patients may continue to present functional problems following surgery, reflected through varying degrees of fecal escape and constipation. [41][42][43][44][45] CONCLUSIONS Computerized anorectal manometry and profilometry are very useful methods for physiologically evaluating the anorectal region of children who have undergone surgery to correct anorectal anomalies. They are also very useful for postoperative follow-up and therapeutic planning, with objective and efficacious criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%