2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-003-0714-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of pulmonary vein isolation by catheter ablation evaluated by ECG-gated multislice computed tomography

Abstract: As pulmonary vein (PV) isolation by catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation may cause PV luminal stenosis, digital subtraction angiography or magnetic resonance imaging have been used to evaluate the lumen of the PV. Electrocardiogram-gated multislice computed tomography can evaluate the lumen of the PV from any plane desired after acquisition with excellent spatial resolution. It can also evaluate hyperplasia of soft tissue around the lumen of the PV, which cannot be evaluated by digital subtract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Often, the cause of the symptoms is elusive, and patients can be unsuccessfully treated for several weeks or months before the diagnosis is made 10 . The diagnosis can be made with a variety of noninvasive imaging modalities, including echocardiography, 5 magnetic resonance angiography, 5,13,14 ventilation/perfusion imaging, 15 and computed tomographic angiography 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, the cause of the symptoms is elusive, and patients can be unsuccessfully treated for several weeks or months before the diagnosis is made 10 . The diagnosis can be made with a variety of noninvasive imaging modalities, including echocardiography, 5 magnetic resonance angiography, 5,13,14 ventilation/perfusion imaging, 15 and computed tomographic angiography 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has also been used to accurately evaluate for PV stenosis [65]. Despite the benefits of no radiation exposure to the patient and no nephrotoxic contrast, MDCT is the preferred imaging modality due to a better special resolution and a very short acquisition time [66]. MRI is an alternative modality that can be used if a patient has a contraindication to contrast dye used in MDCT.…”
Section: Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%