1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90445-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of retained internal bolster after pediatric percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of complications related to removal of the PEG are recognised [1][2][3][4][5][6]. These have primarily been due to retention within the bowel of components of the PEG, consisting either of remnants of broken tubes or, more commonly, of detachable internal retaining crossbars [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A number of complications related to removal of the PEG are recognised [1][2][3][4][5][6]. These have primarily been due to retention within the bowel of components of the PEG, consisting either of remnants of broken tubes or, more commonly, of detachable internal retaining crossbars [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have primarily been due to retention within the bowel of components of the PEG, consisting either of remnants of broken tubes or, more commonly, of detachable internal retaining crossbars [2][3][4][5]. Indeed, PEGs have been removed by traction, by cutting the tube at the skin level [5] or by using devices assembled with an internal detachable crossbar, which slid off the tube when this was pulled out [1,4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Small bowel volvulus around the PEG and subsequent obstruction has also been reported (Alawadhi et al, 1991;Al-Homaidhi & Tolia, 2001;Hoffer et al, 1999). Additionally, loosening of the external bolster can allow migration of the internal bumper through the pylorus into the small bowel, mimicking small bowel obstruction (Hoffer et al, 1999;Mollitt et al, 1998;Schrag et al, 2007). Wound Infection is a common occurrence, with local infection found to occur in up to 23% of cases (Lee et al, 2002).…”
Section: Complications Of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is commonly performed in adult practice, but is generally thought to be unacceptable in children due to risks of esophageal and intestinal obstruction. Esophageal obstruction, perforation, mediastinitis, retropharyngeal abscess formation, gastric outlet, intestinal and ileostomy obstruction, enterocutaneous fistula formation, tract disruption and death have been variously described with PEG removal (Yaseen et al, 1996, Siegel and Douglass, 2004, Palmer et al, 2006, Mollitt et al, 1998, Lattuneddu et al, 2003, Kobak et al, 2000, El-Rifai et al, 2004. Traction removal is performed under general anesthesia in children and involves application of a significant pulling force to deliver the device in full.…”
Section: Replacement Of the Peg Tubementioning
confidence: 99%