2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of the nasal dorsum reconstruction using autologous or alloplastic grafts: evidence from systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The infection rate was relatively low (0%, 95% CI: 0%–0.6%) in this study, which was largely due to the characteristics of the material of autologous cartilage itself as shown in the comparison between autologous and alloplastic grafts in previous meta-analysis43 The previous studies of the meta-analysis reported infection rates of 3.7% in alloplastic grafts,43 2.3% in diced cartilage wrapped in fascia,40 and 0.56% in blocked costal cartilage 39. Long operation time, negligence of perioperative management, diabetes, immune system deficiency, or other diseases may increase the chance of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The infection rate was relatively low (0%, 95% CI: 0%–0.6%) in this study, which was largely due to the characteristics of the material of autologous cartilage itself as shown in the comparison between autologous and alloplastic grafts in previous meta-analysis43 The previous studies of the meta-analysis reported infection rates of 3.7% in alloplastic grafts,43 2.3% in diced cartilage wrapped in fascia,40 and 0.56% in blocked costal cartilage 39. Long operation time, negligence of perioperative management, diabetes, immune system deficiency, or other diseases may increase the chance of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The rate of revision or subsequent rhinoplasticism is one technique of identifying problems. Average revision chirurgical rate 8%-15%, certain specialist groups require revision in 5%-10% of initial cases, as reported in the literature (Hudise, Aldhabaan, & Aldosari, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%