1978
DOI: 10.5035/nishiseisai.27.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of Total Hip Replacement Surgery with K. Y. M. Rotation Type Prosthesis (Modification of Weber-Huggler Type)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed rise in kBa along with the decrease in IBa,ss during application of halothane or isoflurane argues for an increase in the transition rate from states 0 to Ii. In fact, the increase in the rate of inactivation explains the majority of the effect of isoflurane, in agreement with a recent report (Hirota, Fujimura, Wakasugi & Ito, 1996). The slight effect of isoflurane on steady-state inactivation of ICa implies an additional effect of isoflurane, perhaps to increase the transition rate from I1 to I2' There is evidence to suggest that isoflurane and to a lesser extent halothane may reduce the membrane dipole potential which would be consistent with my observations concerning steady-state inactivation (Qin, Szabo & Cafiso, 1995).…”
Section: Cnsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The observed rise in kBa along with the decrease in IBa,ss during application of halothane or isoflurane argues for an increase in the transition rate from states 0 to Ii. In fact, the increase in the rate of inactivation explains the majority of the effect of isoflurane, in agreement with a recent report (Hirota, Fujimura, Wakasugi & Ito, 1996). The slight effect of isoflurane on steady-state inactivation of ICa implies an additional effect of isoflurane, perhaps to increase the transition rate from I1 to I2' There is evidence to suggest that isoflurane and to a lesser extent halothane may reduce the membrane dipole potential which would be consistent with my observations concerning steady-state inactivation (Qin, Szabo & Cafiso, 1995).…”
Section: Cnsupporting
confidence: 93%