2016
DOI: 10.1159/000446985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications with Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in 2,820 Examinations

Abstract: Objective: To perform a retrospective evaluation of the incidence of complications and adverse events during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in 2,820 examinations. Patients and Methods: Subjects included in- and outpatients at Pisa University Hospital referred for FEES by other physicians due to dysphagia symptoms. Neurologic diseases were the most commonly diagnosed conditions in the patients tested (48.3%). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Results: Our study showed minor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is necessary to remember that potential complications and adverse effects of FEES are very few. In one of our previous studies, we found significant complications such as posterior epistaxis in one patient (0.04%) and laryngospasm only in two patients (0.07%) out of 2,820 patients 1 . Moreover, its repeatability makes FEES especially suitable for the follow-up of dysphagic patients, in particular for patients suffering from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) [2][3][4] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is necessary to remember that potential complications and adverse effects of FEES are very few. In one of our previous studies, we found significant complications such as posterior epistaxis in one patient (0.04%) and laryngospasm only in two patients (0.07%) out of 2,820 patients 1 . Moreover, its repeatability makes FEES especially suitable for the follow-up of dysphagic patients, in particular for patients suffering from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) [2][3][4] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…It is easy to perform, well tolerated, not requiring exposure to radiation, suitable for bedside examination, inexpensive, and with rare side-effects 1 . It is necessary to remember that potential complications and adverse effects of FEES are very few.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FEES is a safe procedure with few and rare complications such as epistaxis and transient bradycardia 24 . Nacci et al evaluated the safety of the FEES method and described an incidence of laryngospasm of 0.07%, related to the presence of neuromuscular diseases 25 . FEES seems to be a safe method for the assessing the swallowing function even in acute stroke patients 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, VFSS cannot be used at the bedside frequently for follow-up tests because of the necessary exposure to radiation [ 37 ]. Compared with VFSS, the FEES is a more appropriate assessment tool for dysphagia assessment after stroke, especially for our study which concerns oral and pharyngeal phase of swallowing [ 38 , 39 ]. For stroke patients, a bedside test will ensure patient's comfort and compliance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%