2017
DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000000956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications With New Oral Anticoagulants Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban in Cutaneous Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29,30 It has been demonstrated that the bleeding-risk might be increased by DOAC-therapy, and in some cases, even severe post-operative bleeding has been described. [31][32][33][34][35] Our study showed a rate of severe bleeding of 2.67% under api/dab and 0.79% under riv/edo, without significant difference compared to patients without AP/ AC-medication. Thus, the risk of severe bleeding was not increased under DOAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…29,30 It has been demonstrated that the bleeding-risk might be increased by DOAC-therapy, and in some cases, even severe post-operative bleeding has been described. [31][32][33][34][35] Our study showed a rate of severe bleeding of 2.67% under api/dab and 0.79% under riv/edo, without significant difference compared to patients without AP/ AC-medication. Thus, the risk of severe bleeding was not increased under DOAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…An interdisciplinary study with a predefined dosing regimen for DOAC showed rates of severe bleeding of 0.59% (apixaban), 0.91% (dabigatran) and 1.27% (rivaroxaban) in the overall group, but no bleeding event in the subgroup of dermatological patients 29,30 . It has been demonstrated that the bleeding‐risk might be increased by DOAC‐therapy, and in some cases, even severe post‐operative bleeding has been described 31–35 . Our study showed a rate of severe bleeding of 2.67% under api/dab and 0.79% under riv/edo, without significant difference compared to patients without AP/AC‐medication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Previous studies that suggested an increased risk of bleeding related to NOACs had fewer patients on NOACs and either did not have a comparison group or failed to include patients taking no antithrombotic agents. 5,6 In contrast to patients on NOAC monotherapy, patients taking NOAC and aspirin combination therapy had an increased risk of bleeding. In addition, the risk of bleeding was elevated, although to a lesser degree, in patients taking other combinations of antithrombotic agents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The current data on the risk of bleeding complications related to NOACs during MMS are limited. Small retrospective cohort studies and case series have shown mixed results, with some suggesting an increased risk of bleeding among patients taking NOACs 5,6 and others reporting a low risk. [7][8][9] The limitations of prior studies include a small number of patients on NOACs, lack of a control group, and/or no information regarding patient outcomes after bleeding events.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher bleeding rates were observed by a separate retrospective review of 15 patients on rivaroxaban who underwent 18 Mohs micrographic surgery at a single institution. 35 Of the 18 procedures, 3 (16%) were complicated by postoperative hematomas, with 2 of the hematomas requiring rivaroxaban cessation for 4 days to control the bleeding. Despite the increased risk of bleeding observed in this study, the authors still recommended continuing patients' prescribed anticoagulant.…”
Section: Dermatologic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%