2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2021.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Component analysis and risk assessment of biogas slurry from biogas plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2022, Ke and colleagues investigated the composition of digestate produced from 5 different feedstocks collected from 31 biogas plants in China [ 28 ]. More specifically, thirteen plants used swine manure as digester feedstock, seven used cattle manure, four used straw–manure mixture, four used chicken manure, and three used kitchen waste.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2022, Ke and colleagues investigated the composition of digestate produced from 5 different feedstocks collected from 31 biogas plants in China [ 28 ]. More specifically, thirteen plants used swine manure as digester feedstock, seven used cattle manure, four used straw–manure mixture, four used chicken manure, and three used kitchen waste.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Californian plant [ 24 ], the only substance monitored in the digestate—ammonium—showed a low concentration, which could not inhibit biological activities. On the other hand, in the Chinese plants [ 28 ], the digestate was analysed for several substances, ranging from antibiotics to heavy metals, in order to assess the quality and health security of the digestate. The use of this digestate did not guarantee health nor environmental security, but the peculiarity of the study context, including the origin of the biomasses and the Chinese regulation on these topics, does not allow a comparison between this kind of digestate and the one produced in EU plants, where digestate use is regulated by the Commission Regulation (EU) No142/2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biogas slurry discharged from intensive large-scale livestock and poultry farms, and biogas plants was more than 1.3 billion tons each year in the global area [ 36 , 37 ]. It has exceeded the maximum fertilizer-carrying capacity of plant growth on limited nearby farmland when used as fertilizer, and its application is greatly affected by agricultural seasonality [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future research, we will identify the optimal ratio for combining the biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer to reduce the usage of chemical fertilizer and input costs, while maintaining the levels of soil nutrients at reasonable levels. In addition to this, a significant amount of heavy metals are present in the biogas slurry, which increases the possibility that heavy metals will accumulate in the soil following repeated applications of biogas slurry [71,72]. These heavy metals can be transferred to the food chain through the forage grass and could pose a potential risk from livestock products.…”
Section: Sustainability Of Soil Health With the Application Of Biogas...mentioning
confidence: 99%