2006
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Component and shaking table tests for full-scale multiple friction pendulum system

Abstract: The use of base isolation in developed countries including the U.S. and Japan has already been recognized as a very effective method for upgrading the seismic resistance of structures. In this study, an advanced base‐isolation system called the multiple friction pendulum system (MFPS) is investigated to understand its performance on seismic mitigation through full‐scale component and shaking table tests. The component tests of the advanced Teflon composite coated on the sliding surface show that the friction c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 3, the hysteretic behavior is rigid linear with post-elastic stiffness equal to the sum of the effective radii of surfaces 2 and 3 and strength equal to the average coefficient of friction on these two surfaces. The behavior is identical to a double FP bearing with concave surfaces of equal radii and equal friction [18][19][20].…”
Section: Sliding Regime Imentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure 3, the hysteretic behavior is rigid linear with post-elastic stiffness equal to the sum of the effective radii of surfaces 2 and 3 and strength equal to the average coefficient of friction on these two surfaces. The behavior is identical to a double FP bearing with concave surfaces of equal radii and equal friction [18][19][20].…”
Section: Sliding Regime Imentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Equation (19) demonstrates that as soon as sliding starts on surface 4, it stops on surface 3. This can be proven by solving Equation (6) for u 3 with F = F f4 .…”
Section: Sliding Regime IIImentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This exponential function is the same proposed for PTFE (Constantinou et al 1990), and proves to also be applicable for the PET material even though the effect of velocity on friction is the opposite of that for PTFE. The friction coefficient of polymers is generally known to decrease during continuous loading, the effect being related to self-heating of the sliding interface (Stachowiak and Batchelor 2005), until a new thermal equilibrium condition is reached (Ettles 1987;Quaglini et al 2009). Figure 6 reports the trend of the friction coefficient over repeated cycling obtained by the Efficiency Test carried out at an average velocity of v = 200 mm/s for a total of 20 cycles with a 75 mm amplitude.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Pet Blendmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among others, it is worth recalling the following factors that have contributed to the success of this technology: i) inherently low vibration frequency even when the mass pertaining to each isolator is not particularly high since the natural period primarily depends on the radius of curvature of the concave sliding surface rather than on the supported mass; ii) large displacement capability, limited only by the in-plane geometric dimensions of the device; iii) compact shape with considerably lower thickness than the elastomeric devices, a feature that makes them appealing for seismic retrofitting of existing structures; iv) theoretically zero residual displacements owing to the self-centering action induced by the pendulum operating principle; v) quite stable energy dissipation mainly controlled by the tribological properties of the sliding interfaces, a field on which material science has made significant progress in developing high performance materials with enhanced durability, mechanical and physical characteristics, see e.g. [12,15,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, i.e., with the primary sliding surface on the top rather than on the bottom, however this different geometric layout does not affect the mechanical behavior of the device as a whole. Regardless of the geometric variants, the single CSS and the more recent advancements in double [9] and triple [19] CSS alike are highly flexible devices in the horizontal direction and stiff in the vertical one. The goal of this paper is to examine, from a numerical point of view, some aspects of the mechanical behavior of FP bearings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%