Component costs of foodborne illness: a scoping review

Abstract

BackgroundGovernments require high-quality scientific evidence to prioritize resource allocation and the cost-of-illness (COI) methodology is one technique used to estimate the economic burden of a disease. However, variable cost inventories make it difficult to interpret and compare costs across multiple studies.MethodsA scoping review was conducted to identify the component costs and the respective data sources used for estimating the cost of foodborne illnesses in a population. This review was accomplished by: (1) identifying the research question and relevant literature, (2) selecting the literature, (3) charting, collating, and summarizing the results. All pertinent data were extracted at the level of detail reported in a study, and the component cost and source data were subsequently grouped into themes.ResultsEighty-four studies were identified that described the cost of foodborne illness in humans. Most studies (80%) were published in the last two decades (1992–2012) in North America and Europe. The 10 most frequently estimated costs were due to illnesses caused by bacterial foodborne pathogens, with non-typhoidal Salmonella spp. being the most commonly studied. Forty studies described both individual (direct and indirect) and societal level costs. The direct individual level component costs most often included were hospital services, physician personnel, and drug costs. The most commonly reported indirect individual level component cost was productivity losses due to sick leave from work. Prior estimates published in the literature were the most commonly used source of component cost data. Data sources were not provided or specifically linked to component costs in several studies.ConclusionsThe results illustrated a highly variable depth and breadth of individual and societal level component costs, and a wide range of data sources being used. This scoping review can be used as evidence that there is a lack of standardization in cost inventories in the cost of foodborne illness literature, and to promote greater transparency and detail of data source reporting. By conforming to a more standardized cost inventory, and by reporting data sources in more detail, there will be an increase in cost of foodborne illness research that can be interpreted and compared in a meaningful way.

Evaluating food safety and hygiene knowledge and practices among foodservice staff of feeding scheme in the primary schools in Soweto, South Africa

“…Additionally, inability to cover mouths or hair during food preparation can render food handlers as potential sources of food contamination (Sani & Siow, ). The consequence of this practice could be dangerous for learners as their food could become contaminated by hair strands or microorganism from the mouths of food handlers, particularly workers who are down with airborne diseases (McLinden, Sargeant, Thomas, Papadopoulos, & Fazil, ; Parra, Kim, Shapiro, Gravani, & Bradley, ).…”

Barriers and Facilitators to Safe Food Handling among Consumers: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research Studies

“…In Canada, approximately 4 million cases of domestically-acquired foodborne illness occur each year, resulting in an estimated 11,600 hospitalizations and 238 deaths [4,5]. These illnesses have significant economic impacts on society through direct healthcare costs and indirect costs such as lost productivity [6], and they occasionally also result in costly food recalls and trade disruptions.…”

Bacterial Agents Causing Food Poisoning among Patients Attending Thika Level 5 Hospital, Kiambu County, Kenya

“…Food poisoning is a significant public health problem as well as endemic worldwide and is one of the most common reasons for visiting accident and emergency department (EDs), [1] Millennium development goal number one which is to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger [2] is being directly compromised due to food borne illnesses [3]. This is because money is spent on medical costs instead of development and days are lost due to illness and disability.…”