2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Component-Level Seismic Performance Assessment of Instrumented Super High-Rise Buildings under Bidirectional Long-Period Ground Motions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, many researchers pointed out that longduration ground motions may cause severe structural/nonstructural damage to long-period structures. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Especially in Japan, long-duration ground motions caused by big earthquakes may bring great losses to large cities on soft sedimentary basin. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify what is effective for improving the resilience of high-rise buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, many researchers pointed out that longduration ground motions may cause severe structural/nonstructural damage to long-period structures. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Especially in Japan, long-duration ground motions caused by big earthquakes may bring great losses to large cities on soft sedimentary basin. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify what is effective for improving the resilience of high-rise buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, many researchers pointed out that long‐duration ground motions may cause severe structural/non‐structural damage to long‐period structures 20–28 . Especially in Japan, long‐duration ground motions caused by big earthquakes may bring great losses to large cities on soft sedimentary basin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though typical EDPs, including interstory drifts, inelastic deformations, or floor accelerations, can meet the requirement of damage quantification, state-of-art PBEE damage evaluation guidelines (ASCE 2014) still have some limitations such as ground motion hazard characterization, nonlinear structural modeling, and, most notably, incomplete loss modeling (Altoontash 2004;Haselton et al 2008). Usually, the component-level and system-level damage states are assessed and related to specific performance levels (LS, IO, CP) according to such macroscopic parameters, but it does not attempt to quantify the probability of achieving the given performance level for structures (Erberik et al 2019;Xu and Hu 2021). According to the popularity of seismic fragility in PBEE, the post-earthquake evaluation may take the data-driven damage index into consideration and develop a probability assessment method regarding critical performance and damage states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical simulation method with physics and mechanics knowledges is the most developed and used approach for modeling nonlinear behaviors of RC components. Successful studies and illustrations have been presented on nonlinear finite element method (FEM) analysis of RC components, 11 including membranes, 12 beams, 13 slabs, 14 and panels. 15 However, the user experience-based parameter setups, the increased complexity of physical structures, and less realistic model assumptions may deteriorate the simulation accuracy and introduce the case and user-dependent modeling uncertainty, which is evidently shown through worldwide blind prediction contests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%