1992
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/1992260303851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Component mode synthesis and eigenvalues of second order operators : discretization and algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We would not in general expect a similar result for the "classical" non-singular Sturm-Liouville choice s m,j = 1, and we note that port reduction approaches within the CMS framework [6,18] typically consider regular rather than singular eigenproblems. Also note that in the case y m,j = 0 a solution to (36) is always (κ 1 m,j = 0, τ 1 m,j = constant), and hence χ m,j,1 is constant for any y m,j (recall in the case y m,j > 0 we set χ m,j,1 = ρ m,j,1 , which is chosen constant).…”
Section: Port Approximationmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We would not in general expect a similar result for the "classical" non-singular Sturm-Liouville choice s m,j = 1, and we note that port reduction approaches within the CMS framework [6,18] typically consider regular rather than singular eigenproblems. Also note that in the case y m,j = 0 a solution to (36) is always (κ 1 m,j = 0, τ 1 m,j = constant), and hence χ m,j,1 is constant for any y m,j (recall in the case y m,j > 0 we set χ m,j,1 = ρ m,j,1 , which is chosen constant).…”
Section: Port Approximationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…6 We then perform a data compression step: we invoke the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) [19] (with respect to the L 2 (Γ p * ) inner product). The output from the POD procedure is a set of y m,j − 1 mutually L 2 (Γ p * )-orthonormal empirical modes which have the additional property that they are orthogonal to the constant function over Γ p * .…”
Section: End Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the eigenfunctions of (5.7) and (5.8) belonging to the smallest eigenvalues are well suited to approximate the sought eigensolutions (λ j , u j ) nes j=1 of the global problem (4.2). This issue is reasoned by various numerical studies (see, e.g., [16]) and is motivated by the error analysis done in [21,22] for a method quite similar to AMLS. Correspondingly, to approximate the sought eigensolutions of problem (4.2), in the third step of AMLS the finite dimensional subspace U k ⊂ H 1 0 (Ω) is defined by…”
Section: The Amls Methods In the Continuous Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An easy calculation shows that for all α ∈ N d the functions u α (x) are eigenfunctions of the PDE problem (2.17) with the associated eigenvalues 21) and because of u α ∈ H 1 0 (Ω) it follows that (λ α , u α ) is also an eigensolution of (2.18). In particular, all eigensolutions of (2.18) are described by (λ α , u α ) α∈N d .…”
Section: Laplace Eigenvalue Problem On the Unit Cubementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation