1992
DOI: 10.2307/585196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Components of a Model Adolescent AIDS/Drug Abuse Prevention Program: A Delphi Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study used an average score of6.00 and above as the cut-offbetween support and rejection (Adams et al, 1992), while a second study used an average score of 5.50 and above (Fish & Osborn, 1992). Neither study identified other levels of supportstatements were either supported or rejected.…”
Section: The Results Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…One study used an average score of6.00 and above as the cut-offbetween support and rejection (Adams et al, 1992), while a second study used an average score of 5.50 and above (Fish & Osborn, 1992). Neither study identified other levels of supportstatements were either supported or rejected.…”
Section: The Results Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distinction between resolved and unresolved statements is taken from Adams et al (1992) and Fish and Osborn (1992). The interquartile range is a statistical representation of the spread of scores.…”
Section: The Results Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The success of any Delphi application is intrinsically linked to expert selection and the declaration of selection criteria (Adams et al, 1992;Stone Fish & Osborn, 1992;Goldschmidt, 1996). The resource management literature is replete with examples of expert consultation and input into decision-making; however, it is short on selection criteria (Needham & deLoe, 1990).…”
Section: Delphi Expertsmentioning
confidence: 99%