No Child Left Behind has highlighted the need for new types of assessments that not only provide high-quality evidence about what students know and can do, but also help to move learning forward. This paper describes a linked set of formative and summative reading assessments designed to address the tradeoffs inherent in these two goals.Targeted skills include the full range of competencies underlying proficient reading at the middle-school level, including both lower-order skills such as oral reading fluency and decoding, and higher-order skills such as the ability to integrate and synthesize information from multiple texts. Data collected in pilot administrations of two prototype test forms are presented. Analyses suggest that this new approach yields acceptable measurement properties while simultaneously addressing crucial learning outcomes. This ii Table 4 CBAL assessments seek to achieve these goals by incorporating the following innovations: (a) Linked summative and formative assessments are based on a theory of domain competency that specifies both what students should be learning and how that learning is likely to develop over time; (b) assessments include innovative scenario-based tasks designed to model expert teaching practice and to encourage the use of classroom activities that have been shown to support learning; (c) assessments are administered at multiple time points spaced throughout the school year so that information about student achievement can be shared with teachers while there is still time to take needed instructional action; and (d) state-of-the-art automated scoring technologies are used to broaden the array of skills assessed, and to ensure that score reports are provided in a timely manner.
List of TablesAlthough the CBAL Initiative includes summative, formative, and professional support components, this paper addresses the summative and formative components only. In particular, we report research focused on the development and evaluation of linked summative and formative reading assessments designed to provide high quality evidence for state accountability purposes while simultaneously addressing key learning goals. . The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. First, we describe the framework developed to guide the assessment design; second, we describe a set of prototype reading assessments targeted at readers in Grades 7 and 8; and finally, we present pilot data collected in a large northeastern school district.
2
The CBAL Reading FrameworkExisting accountability assessments have been characterized as representing a view of proficiency that is "a mile wide and an inch deep" (Schmidt, McKnight, & Raizen, 1997). CBAL assessments, by contrast, are designed to collect deeper evidence about a more modest number of instructionally-relevant competencies. The framework developed to guide this process includes three structures: a competency model, a set of hypothesized learning progressions (LPs), and a set of task design principles. These structures are described be...