Comportement alimentaire des nourrissons et jeunes enfants de 0 à 36 mois : comparaison des habitudes des mères

Heuzey, M.-F. Le; Turberg-Romain, C.; Lelièvre, Bénédicte

doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2007.08.011

Cited by 18 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This age corresponds with the widening of the food repertoire (28) and the onset of food neophobia (29,30). The transition toward a more varied diet may be accompanied by a decrease in the appeal of vegetables compared with other food categories (31) and may explain the decrease in artichoke acceptance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…During the exposure period, the energy intake related to the ingestion of the energy-dense purée (;650 kJ) was greater than those related to the other artichoke purées (;300 kJ for the sweet purée and 250 kJ for the basic purée). At 6-7 mo, infants require ;2700 kJ/d to cover their needs for metabolism and growth (36), which is generally covered by 5 meals/d, including milk feedings (31). If infants ate until meeting their energy needs, one may wonder why infants in the 2 other groups did not eat more.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Repeated Exposure of Infants at Complementary Feeding to a Vegetable Purée Increases Acceptance as Effectively as Flavor-Flavor Learning and More Effectively Than Flavor-Nutrient Learning1–4

Rémy

Issanchou

Chabanet

et al. 2013

The Journal of Nutrition

150

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Children's vegetable consumption is below the public health recommendations. This study aimed to compare learning mechanisms to increase vegetable acceptance in infants at complementary feeding, namely repeated exposure (RE), flavor-flavor learning (FFL), and flavor-nutrient learning (FNL); measure the stability of the learning effect; and examine the impact of infants' feeding history on vegetable acceptance. The study was composed of a preexposure test, an exposure period, a postexposure test, and tests at 2-wk, 3-mo, and 6-mo follow-ups. At pre- and postexposure, a basic artichoke purée and carrot purée were presented to 95 French infants (6.4 ± 0.8 mo). During the exposure period, infants were randomly split into 3 groups and were exposed 10 times to the basic (RE group; 2 kJ/g; n = 32), a sweet (FFL group; 2 kJ/g; n = 32), or an energy-dense (FNL group; 6 kJ/g; n = 31) artichoke purée 2 or 3 times/wk. To evaluate acceptance, intake (g) and liking were recorded at home by parents. Between pre- and postexposure, intake of the basic artichoke purée significantly increased in the RE (+63%) and FFL (+39%) groups but not in the FNL group; liking increased only in the RE group (+21%). After exposure, artichoke was as much consumed and as much liked as carrot only in the RE group. Learning of artichoke acceptance was stable up to 3 mo postexposure. Initial artichoke intake was significantly related to the number of vegetables offered before the study started. RE is as effective as and simpler to implement than FFL and more effective than FNL for increasing vegetable acceptance at complementary feeding.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Repeated Exposure of Infants at Complementary Feeding to a Vegetable Purée Increases Acceptance as Effectively as Flavor-Flavor Learning and More Effectively Than Flavor-Nutrient Learning1–4

Rémy

Issanchou

Chabanet

et al. 2013

The Journal of Nutrition

150

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous works have shown that to best feed their child, families and especially mothers tend to primarily refer to the pediatrician until the child reaches the age of two, then to the general practitioner, the entourage and the experience [55,56]. Therefore, we chose to focus on (a) parents and families and (b) professionals of early childhood and health.…”

Section: Are There Differences Between Societal Target Groups?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Safety vs. Sustainability Concerns of Infant Food Users: French Results and European Perspectives

Kurtz

Thomopoulos

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context. In line with Sustainable Development Goals 3 “Good health and well-being” and 12 “Responsible Consumption and Production”, this paper is concerned with the fragile population of the less-than-3-years-old children. More specifically, it investigates how infant food safety is perceived at the household level and at the level of childhood and health professionals directly in contact with them. Objective. The paper aims to analyze consumer priorities and perceptions of hazards in infant foods qualitatively and quantitatively. Methodology. To do so, a survey was carried out in France on 1750 people representative of the general population. A hybrid method is proposed to analyze the results of the survey, mixing artificial intelligence and statistics. Main insights. Within the declared priorities when choosing infant food, health comes first, with a top ranking for the absence of harmful substances, followed closely by nutritional balance—far ahead of environment, ease of use and price. The results show that the rankings of the hazards that cause the most worry are globally homogeneous throughout the populations (families, professionals, etc.) and higher for chemical contaminants from agricultural practices and packaging. For health professionals, concerns are higher than in the general population for all categories of contaminants, and specific concerns such as risk related to environmental and unknown contaminants are much more prevalent. The perception of risk varies with the food considered. For infant formula in particular, users seem puzzled by somehow contradictory messages. Perspectives. The study is intended to be generalized to Europe.

show abstract

“…The majority of the parents agreed having dinner with their family during their childhood was important and family meals could strengthen family bonds 1,16,17 . Parents also shared that the family meal was one of the memorable events in their childhood life because it was a good opportunity to exchange information among family members 16,18 . In addition, family meals provide an opportunity for parents to transfer values, goals, and culture to their children 1,17,19 .…”

Section: Childhood Family Meal Experiencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Family perception is the ways that parents perceived family meals and their attitudes toward these meals. It could be divided into three sub-themes in order to explain the perception of family, including: 1) family perception on eating out with children 18,22,23 ; 2) family perception on the benefits of family meal 20,23 ; and 3) family perception on the challenges of family meal 17,20 . Most of the families agreed that some parents still used the same rules as dinner in their childhood such as avoiding electronic devices and unruly behavior [23][24][25] .…”

Section: Family Perceptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Family Meals Experiences Families with Adolescents: A Descriptive of Literature Review

Suksatan¹,

Choompunuch²,

Posai³

2021

Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Family meals play an important factor in family relationships and are considered as a symbol of family communication. Family meals were associated with increased dietary consumption and improved psychosocial health. However, few studies have focused on the experience of eating together as a family. The aim of the current literature review was to explore the benefits and challenges of eating together as a family, and how family members adopt and modify family meals from their childhood experiences. Methods Studies were included if the researchers examined family meals or family dinners or family Meals experiences of families with adolescents; nine articles met the criteria. The studies published between 2010 and 2019 taken from Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL databases.Results This literature review of family meals provides an understanding of parents' and children's experience in the family meals. The results are divided into three themes including: 1) childhood family meal experience; 2) the role and responsibility of family members; and 3) family perception. ConclusionParents' childhood experiences influenced the types of food, norms, and cultures, that the family displayed at current meals. The family roles and responsibilities had changed from the past. Parents tried to preserve the family meals as an opportunity to connect the present with past experiences. Parents could spend this period interacting with their children and transmitting the norms and culture to the next generation.

show abstract

Comportement alimentaire des nourrissons et jeunes enfants de 0 à 36 mois : comparaison des habitudes des mères

Cited by 18 publications

References 12 publications

Repeated Exposure of Infants at Complementary Feeding to a Vegetable Purée Increases Acceptance as Effectively as Flavor-Flavor Learning and More Effectively Than Flavor-Nutrient Learning1–4

Repeated Exposure of Infants at Complementary Feeding to a Vegetable Purée Increases Acceptance as Effectively as Flavor-Flavor Learning and More Effectively Than Flavor-Nutrient Learning1–4

Safety vs. Sustainability Concerns of Infant Food Users: French Results and European Perspectives

Family Meals Experiences Families with Adolescents: A Descriptive of Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About