1983
DOI: 10.1051/animres:19830404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comportement alimentaire et mérycique d'ovins et de bovins recevant des fourrages verts

Abstract: RésuméNous avons dis2ribué, simultanément à des moutons et des génisses de 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0
3

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When the deer were fed long pieces of lucerne hay they responded by increasing their chewing rate (bites/min and bites/g DM consumed) but this could not compensate for the effects of the more difficult physical form and the rate of feed consumption fell. Forages with higher cell wall or cellulose contents are eaten more slowly and require more chewing (Dulphy & Michalet-Doreau 1983), and the consumption rates (g OM/min) and chewing activity (bites/g OM consumed) in Expt 2 (Table 4) are consistent with this. Comparison of lucerne hay and chicory (the forages with the greatest and least concentrations of CWOM) shows that lucerne hay was comminuted the most completely (Table 3) and was associated with high efficiency indexes (Table 4) while chicory was comminuted less than all the other forages and had low indexes of chewing efficiency.…”
Section: Influence Of Physical Form and Cell Wall Content On The Ingesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…When the deer were fed long pieces of lucerne hay they responded by increasing their chewing rate (bites/min and bites/g DM consumed) but this could not compensate for the effects of the more difficult physical form and the rate of feed consumption fell. Forages with higher cell wall or cellulose contents are eaten more slowly and require more chewing (Dulphy & Michalet-Doreau 1983), and the consumption rates (g OM/min) and chewing activity (bites/g OM consumed) in Expt 2 (Table 4) are consistent with this. Comparison of lucerne hay and chicory (the forages with the greatest and least concentrations of CWOM) shows that lucerne hay was comminuted the most completely (Table 3) and was associated with high efficiency indexes (Table 4) while chicory was comminuted less than all the other forages and had low indexes of chewing efficiency.…”
Section: Influence Of Physical Form and Cell Wall Content On The Ingesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Nous avons entrepris, chez le mouton, un travail systématique sur ce sujet, les ré-sultats concernant les fourrages verts (Dulphy et Demarquilly, 1974;Dulphy et Bechet, 1976; Michalet-Doreau, 1983) ont déjà été publiés, ainsi que ceux concernant les ensilages d'herbe (Dulphy, Michalet-Doreau et Demarquilly, 1984 (Dulphy et Bechet, 1976) : DUM = 26,92 …”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Les (Dulphy et Michalet-Doreau, 1983) (Ruckebusch, 1963) Faverdin, 1985 ;Gill, Campling et Westgarth, 1966 (Gatel, 1984 (Freer, Campling et Freer et Campling, 1965 (Freer, Campling et Hidari, 1970 (Faverdin, 1985). La (Tulloh, 1966) que chez la brebis (Weekes, 1971 (Guérin et (Baile, 1979).…”
unclassified