2018
DOI: 10.2969/jmsj/77237723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composing generic linearly perturbed mappings and immersions/injections

Abstract: Let N (resp., U ) be a manifold (resp., an open subset of R m ). Let f : N → U and F : U → R ℓ be an immersion and a C ∞ mapping, respectively. Generally, the composition F • f does not necessarily yield a mapping transverse to a given subfiber-bundle of J 1 (N, R ℓ ). Nevertheless, in this paper, for any A 1 -invariant fiber, we show that composing generic linearly perturbed mappings of F and the given immersion f yields a mapping transverse to the subfiber-bundle of J 1 (N, R ℓ ) with the given fiber. Moreov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) The essential idea for the proofs of Theorems 1 and 2 is to apply Lemma 1, and it is similar to the idea of the proofs of [2, Theorems 1 and 2]. Note that in the special case r = ∞, from some results in [2], the results in this paper (Theorems 1 and 2 in this section and Corollaries 1 to 7 in Section 5) can be obtained.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(3) The essential idea for the proofs of Theorems 1 and 2 is to apply Lemma 1, and it is similar to the idea of the proofs of [2, Theorems 1 and 2]. Note that in the special case r = ∞, from some results in [2], the results in this paper (Theorems 1 and 2 in this section and Corollaries 1 to 7 in Section 5) can be obtained.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Since max{2n − ℓ, 0} = 0, from Corollary 4, there exists a subset Σ of L(R m , R ℓ ) with Lebesgue measure zero such that for any π ∈ L(R m , R ℓ ) − Σ, the mapping (F π • f ) (2) : N (2) → (R ℓ ) 2 is transverse to ∆ 2 . For this proof, it is sufficient to prove that the mapping (F π • f ) (2) satisfies that (F π • f ) (2)…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations