1996
DOI: 10.2307/3152216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite Branding Alliances: An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

10
214
1
13

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
214
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Park et al (1996) demonstrate that cobranding by two favorably evaluated brands does not lead to a more favorably evaluated cobranded product, because of their redundancy and probably a ceiling effect. Therefore a brand with high equity has less to gain from an association with an organic label than one with less brand equity.…”
Section: Brand Equity and Label Equity: Cobranding And The Marginal Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Park et al (1996) demonstrate that cobranding by two favorably evaluated brands does not lead to a more favorably evaluated cobranded product, because of their redundancy and probably a ceiling effect. Therefore a brand with high equity has less to gain from an association with an organic label than one with less brand equity.…”
Section: Brand Equity and Label Equity: Cobranding And The Marginal Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the attribute level, Park et al (1996) demonstrate the importance of brands' complementarity for effective alliances. Brands are complementary when they have a common set of relevant attributes but differ in their attribute salience or performance.…”
Section: Brand Equity and Label Equity: Cobranding And The Marginal Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations