2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.vehcom.2021.100337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite fault diagnosis methodology for urban vehicular ad hoc network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 10, although the average speed of the proposed method is almost consistent with that of the first two benchmark methods during approximately 30-100s as well as lower than the actuated STA method in approximately 20-30 s, it is significantly higher than the comparison methods in other time periods. It is shown that using the proposed FIGURE 10 Comparison results of average speed under typical cooperative driving method, the travel time for CAVs to leave the conflict zone is approximately 120s, which is significantly lower than that of the other three benchmark methods. Further, the results illustrate that, compared with the three benchmark algorithms, the proposed method can reduce the travel time of CAVs and improve the road traffic efficiency under the conditions of time-varying delays and packet losses at the intersections, which can satisfy our expectations of the algorithm.…”
Section: Figure 6 Comparison Results Of Average Speed Under Different...mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure 10, although the average speed of the proposed method is almost consistent with that of the first two benchmark methods during approximately 30-100s as well as lower than the actuated STA method in approximately 20-30 s, it is significantly higher than the comparison methods in other time periods. It is shown that using the proposed FIGURE 10 Comparison results of average speed under typical cooperative driving method, the travel time for CAVs to leave the conflict zone is approximately 120s, which is significantly lower than that of the other three benchmark methods. Further, the results illustrate that, compared with the three benchmark algorithms, the proposed method can reduce the travel time of CAVs and improve the road traffic efficiency under the conditions of time-varying delays and packet losses at the intersections, which can satisfy our expectations of the algorithm.…”
Section: Figure 6 Comparison Results Of Average Speed Under Different...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…and take Equation ( 6) into Equation (10) and set šœ•J āˆ•šœ•U Nu (k) = 0 to obtain the optimal control variable…”
Section: Moving Horizon Prediction Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mathematically, the value of the weights can be represented as follows. 58 0 ā‰¤ w1, w2, w3,w4, w5 ā‰¤ 1: Ć°11ƞ If the value of weight is equal to 1, then the weight completely determines the path value . If the value of weight is equal to 0, then the weight has no role in determining the path path value .…”
Section: Transmission Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) In statistics-based detection methods commonly metrics such as the mean, the variance, or the gradient of the sensor data are considered for outlier detection [29], but there are also more sophisticated approaches that, for example, apply the Mann-Whitney U statistical test or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test [30] to identify permanent, intermittent, and transient irregularities in the sensor data [31] as well as 3Ļƒ-based techniques using historical data and the measurements of neighboring nodes [32].…”
Section: Sensor Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%