2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-013-9450-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite reliability of a workplace-based assessment toolbox for postgraduate medical education

Abstract: In recent years, postgraduate assessment programmes around the world have embraced workplace-based assessment (WBA) and its related tools. Despite their widespread use, results of studies on the validity and reliability of these tools have been variable. Although in many countries decisions about residents' continuation of training and certification as a specialist are based on the composite results of different WBAs collected in a portfolio, to our knowledge, the reliability of such a WBA toolbox has never be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
2
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
72
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This represents a significant investment in time and expertise. Some validated assessment tools 36 and guidelines for choosing and combining varied assessments 37,38 are already available.…”
Section: Residentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This represents a significant investment in time and expertise. Some validated assessment tools 36 and guidelines for choosing and combining varied assessments 37,38 are already available.…”
Section: Residentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The portfolio is used to gather relevant information about the tasks a resident has worked on, such as WBAs, relevant exposure to clinical tasks, and feedback. 21 The information in the portfolio helps the program director make entrustment decisions.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No obstante, a pesar de las ventajas que conlleva su utilización, no está exento de dificultades (Driessen Van Tartwijk, Van Der Vleuten y Wass, 2007). Una de ellas es el esfuerzo añadido que supone su uso tanto para el alumnado como para el profesorado (Tompkins y Paquette-Frenette, 2010;Michels, Van Gaal, Bossaert y De Winter, 2010;Shaughnessy y Duggan, 2013;Jenkins Mash y Derese, 2013;Pereira y Dean, 2013;Galán Mañas, 2015) y otra, la ausencia de una fiabilidad alta del instrumento (Donato y George, 2012;Moonen-van Loon, Overeem, Donkers, Van der Vleuten y Driessen, 2013).…”
Section: Importancia Del Portafolios Para La Evaluación De Competenciasunclassified