2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-018-2229-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite Risk for HIV: A New Approach Towards Integrating Biomedical and Behavioral Strategies in Couples-Based HIV Prevention Research

Abstract: A substantial number of new HIV infections among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men and transgender women occurs in the context of primary partnerships. Given the diversity of risk reduction needs and various approaches available for reducing risk within couples, condomless sex is no longer the gold standard HIV outcome. We present a novel, comprehensive, and flexible Composite Risk for HIV (CR-HIV) approach for integrating evolving biomedical and behavioral HIV prevention strategies into coupl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These primary relationships, which involve two or more people who have significant commitments that involve merging the daily infrastructure of their lives in a spouse-like arrangement without specific regard to sexual monogamy and/or emotional connection, have recently garnered greater attention from HIV researchers. This greater attention became apparent as an increasing number of HIV prevention research efforts that were designed to study and intervene on HIV risk within gbMSM partnerships turned their focus to the relevance of these primary relationships [82]. There is much work and empirical investigation that still needs to be done so that future interventions to foster HIV resilience and address HIV/AIDS health disparities could have sufficient evidencebased knowledge on meaningful sexual relationships of gbMSM living with HIV/AIDS to utilize, beginning with the essential aspects within the primary and other meaningful relationships our participants identified and described that contributed to fostering their own resilience to HIV/AIDS.…”
Section: Considering and Valuing Controversial Protective Factors In The Development Of Interventions That Foster Resilience To Hiv/aidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These primary relationships, which involve two or more people who have significant commitments that involve merging the daily infrastructure of their lives in a spouse-like arrangement without specific regard to sexual monogamy and/or emotional connection, have recently garnered greater attention from HIV researchers. This greater attention became apparent as an increasing number of HIV prevention research efforts that were designed to study and intervene on HIV risk within gbMSM partnerships turned their focus to the relevance of these primary relationships [82]. There is much work and empirical investigation that still needs to be done so that future interventions to foster HIV resilience and address HIV/AIDS health disparities could have sufficient evidencebased knowledge on meaningful sexual relationships of gbMSM living with HIV/AIDS to utilize, beginning with the essential aspects within the primary and other meaningful relationships our participants identified and described that contributed to fostering their own resilience to HIV/AIDS.…”
Section: Considering and Valuing Controversial Protective Factors In The Development Of Interventions That Foster Resilience To Hiv/aidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the small number of participants who engaged in condomless sex with primary or casual partners by different partner HIV statuses, we collapsed this into one variable, which may underestimate levels of risk. With advances in biomedical prevention strategies (e.g., PrEP and TasP), better risk assessments are needed to more accurately capture HIV risk behavior (Gamarel, Chakravarty, Neilands, et al (2018). Due to the cross-sectional study design, causal or temporal claims cannot be drawn.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many contexts, other prevention strategies have equal or more relevance such as consistent condom use, monogamy, and sexual decision making based on partners’ serostatus and viral load [66]. We recommend the design of studies that include composite indicators of HIV risk, which recognize the multiple options that can reduce HIV transmission and improve disease progression [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%