2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite Sickles and Cereal Harvesting Methods at 23,000-Years-Old Ohalo II, Israel

Abstract: Use-wear analysis of five glossed flint blades found at Ohalo II, a 23,000-years-old fisher-hunter-gatherers’ camp on the shore of the Sea of Galilee, Northern Israel, provides the earliest evidence for the use of composite cereal harvesting tools. The wear traces indicate that tools were used for harvesting near-ripe semi-green wild cereals, shortly before grains are ripe and disperse naturally. The studied tools were not used intensively, and they reflect two harvesting modes: flint knives held by hand and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation for semi-ripe cereal harvesting is further reinforced by the identification of several flint blades at the site with a gloss typical of cereal harvesting at a semi-ripe stage (Snir, Nadel, Grosman-Yaroslavski, et al 2015). In addition, a use-wear study of five sickle blades shows that cereal harvesting using composite tools with hafted large blades took place at the site (Grosman-Yaroslavski et al 2016). However, the number of such tools and the low-intensity level of the gloss indicate that this practice of cereal collection was not widespread at the site, perhaps indicating that an “uprooting” collection method was more prevalent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This interpretation for semi-ripe cereal harvesting is further reinforced by the identification of several flint blades at the site with a gloss typical of cereal harvesting at a semi-ripe stage (Snir, Nadel, Grosman-Yaroslavski, et al 2015). In addition, a use-wear study of five sickle blades shows that cereal harvesting using composite tools with hafted large blades took place at the site (Grosman-Yaroslavski et al 2016). However, the number of such tools and the low-intensity level of the gloss indicate that this practice of cereal collection was not widespread at the site, perhaps indicating that an “uprooting” collection method was more prevalent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, new data suggest that Epipaleolithic peoples practiced low-level cultivation on an opportunistic basis, with casual use of wild cereal cultivation in the fields of wild cereals (Asouti and Fuller 2012; Fuller et al 2011). Indeed, researchers have argued persuasively for early low-key cereal cultivation based on the Ohalo II data (Grosman-Yaroslavski et al 2016; Snir, Nadel, Grosman-Yaroslavski, et al 2015).…”
Section: Rethinking Late Pleistocene Hunter-gatherer Plant Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ohalo II fish remains offer the sole and earliest evidence to date of a fisher-hunter-gatherer economy along the Lake Kinneret shores, immediately after the peak of the Last Glacial Maximum [ 15 , 17 – 19 , 22 , 26 ]. This economy reveals a complex taphonomic scenario representing evidence of fish preparation and consumption, as part of a very rich diet that encompassed a variety of mammals and birds and, no less important, a wide range of plant foods, including cereals, of which some may have been cultivated [ 39 , 166 , 167 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data from Shubayqa 6 and Kharaysin 1 (PPNA) indicate cutting of semi-ripe cereals (Figure 17). This could potentially be interpreted as evidence for harvesting cultivated wild cereals, which fits the archaeobotanical information indicating wild cereal cultivation during this period in southern Levant (Weiss et al, 2016). Nevertheless, few tools from these sites were analyzed and the archaeobotanical study of both sites has not been completed yet so this conclusion has to be considered preliminary.…”
Section: Evolution Of Plant Harvesting Techniques In the Southern Levantmentioning
confidence: 65%