Composite surface roughness and color change following airflow usage

Abstract

Background Esthetic dental restorations have gained increasing popularity. The surface of restorations should be smooth enough to achieve maximum esthetics and prevent the adhesion of microorganisms and food particles. This study aimed to assess the surface roughness and color change of composite specimens following airflow usage. Methods In this in vitro, experimental study, 30 Tokuyama composite discs were fabricated and randomly divided into three groups (n = 10) for the use of airflow with calcium carbonate/bicarbonate powder and conventional polishing with FlexiDisc. The surface roughness of the specimens was measured by profilometry while the color change was assessed by measuring the L*, a* and b* color parameters using spectrophotometry before polishing (T1). The composite specimens were then polished for stain removal, and their surface roughness as well as color parameters were remeasured after polishing (T2). Paired t-test and Tukey’s test were applied for within-group and between-group comparisons. Results Significant differences were noted in roughness average (Ra) between airflow with calcium carbonate (0.251 ± 0.014 μm) and airflow with sodium bicarbonate (0.421 ± 0.208 μm), and between airflow with sodium bicarbonate and FlexiDisc (0.207 ± 0.076 μm) groups after polishing (P < 0.05). Regarding the correlation of change in surface roughness and color parameters at T1 and T2, an inverse correlation was noted between the change in surface roughness and all color parameters except for L*. In other words, reduction in surface roughness decreased the a* and b* color parameters. Conclusions Within the limitations of this study, the results showed that the airflow device used in this study had no significant difference with conventional polishing in terms of reduction in surface roughness and staining. Considering the cost and maintenance of the airflow device, it is not suggested as a suitable alternative to the conventional polishing procedures. Trial Registration Number: This study does not involve human subjects.

Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Interest for Dental Restorations: A Systematic Review

“…A recent study evaluated that FDM process induces a reduction in surface layer hardness compared to injection-molded PEEK, which could lead to a decrease in the wear resistance of the material [ 32 ]. Gao et al evaluated that the surface roughness of the polished FDM 3D-printed PEEK samples was close to that of amalgam and some ceramic or composite materials used in dental applications [ 32 , 44 , 45 ]. There is a need to evaluate these properties in clinical conditions.…”

Comparative Evaluation of the Repair Bond Strength of Dental Resin Composite after Sodium Bicarbonate or Aluminum Oxide Air-Abrasion

“…Therefore, it is suggested that air polishing should be avoided on all types of RBCs [17]. The mean value of RA as a result of a prophylactic air-polishing can range between 0.3 and 10 µm, and depends on the type of applied powder, exposure time, pressure, and the type of the recipient RBC [17][18][19][20]. However, according to our best knowledge, there is no report in the literature about the effect of sodium bicarbonate air-polishing on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS).…”

Air-Polishing Powders’ Effect on the Color of CAD/CAM Restorative Materials

“…There are studies about the efficiency of the APPs in removing discolorations and the staining susceptibility of restorative materials that are exposed to air-polishing and staining solutions afterward [31][32][33]. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no research on how these APPs themselves affect the color stability of indirect restorative materials such as resin matrix ceramics.…”