1999
DOI: 10.1007/s001070050037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composites made from acetylated lignocellulosic fibers of different origin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WA and TS after 2 and 24-h cold water soaking for 7% UF resin content were respectively 72, 79, 73 and 74% of the properties for 5% UF resin content. It is in agreement with the results of Suzuki et al (1976), Palardy et al (1989), Chow et al (1996), Gomez-Bueso et al (2000) and Halvarsson et al (2008). The properties of wood-based particleboard and medium density fiberboard are strongly dependant on the average density and to some extent on the amount of UF resin added (Suzuki and Kato 1989;Hague et al 1999;Wong et al 2000;Shi et al 2005).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WA and TS after 2 and 24-h cold water soaking for 7% UF resin content were respectively 72, 79, 73 and 74% of the properties for 5% UF resin content. It is in agreement with the results of Suzuki et al (1976), Palardy et al (1989), Chow et al (1996), Gomez-Bueso et al (2000) and Halvarsson et al (2008). The properties of wood-based particleboard and medium density fiberboard are strongly dependant on the average density and to some extent on the amount of UF resin added (Suzuki and Kato 1989;Hague et al 1999;Wong et al 2000;Shi et al 2005).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The effect of this phenomenon on thickness swelling and moisture resistance is higher than that of on mechanical properties. Cross linking by synthetic resins in hardwood fibers, because of their lower lignin content, is more effective than that of in softwood fibers (Back 1987;Gomez-Bueso et al 2000;Halvarsson et al 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, they offer high performance at low cost due to excellent mechanical properties, especially when their low density and price are taken into account in comparison to, for example, E-glass fibres. The main drawbacks, compared with conventional inorganic fibres for composites, are (1) the large scatter in properties of wood fibres, explained by differences in fibre structure due to the overall environmental conditions during growth (Haygreen & Bowyer, 1982), and (2) the inherent susceptibility to moisture uptake and expansion of wood fibres, which negatively influences composite mechanical properties, such as stiffness and strength (Hua et al, 1987;Gomez-Bueso et al, 2000;Saha et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important method of chemical modification is chemical coupling [1] which can be performed via fibre treatment with maleic anhydride-polypropylene copolymers for improving the interface between cellulose based fibres and polypropylene [12]. Other common chemical modification methods, applied for natural fibres are graft copolimerization [13], acetylation [14], alkalization [15] and silanization [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%