2009
DOI: 10.1139/x08-185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition and carbon dynamics of forests in northeastern North America in a future, warmer worldThis article is one of a selection of papers from NE Forests 2100: A Synthesis of Climate Change Impacts on Forests of the Northeastern US and Eastern Canada.

Abstract: Increasing temperatures, precipitation extremes, and other anthropogenic influences (pollutant deposition, increasing carbon dioxide) will influence future forest composition and productivity in the northeastern United States and eastern Canada. This synthesis of empirical and modeling studies includes tree DNA evidence suggesting tree migrations since the last glaciation were much slower, at least under postglacial conditions, than is needed to keep up with current and future climate warming. Exceedances of U… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CO 2 , temperature or moisture), few response variables (growth or survival) and/or individuals small enough to be housed in chambers with suitable replication [4][5][6][7]. The price of this experimental control is a highly conditional view of how diverse forest communities will respond, missing the rich interactions between individuals of different species and sizes competing for resources locally, and the changing combination of growing season length, summer droughts and spatial variation in soils [8][9][10]. Recognition that such interactions are responsible for the diversity of natural ecosystems [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] casts doubt on the extrapolations that come from single factor experiments on seedlings of one or a few species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 , temperature or moisture), few response variables (growth or survival) and/or individuals small enough to be housed in chambers with suitable replication [4][5][6][7]. The price of this experimental control is a highly conditional view of how diverse forest communities will respond, missing the rich interactions between individuals of different species and sizes competing for resources locally, and the changing combination of growing season length, summer droughts and spatial variation in soils [8][9][10]. Recognition that such interactions are responsible for the diversity of natural ecosystems [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] casts doubt on the extrapolations that come from single factor experiments on seedlings of one or a few species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models that project the redistribution of tree species in response to climate change have often used a “climate envelope” approach, with species tracking shifts in key climate parameters including temperature and moisture over space and time (e.g., VEMAP Members 1995; Iverson and Prasad 1998; Iverson et al 2008; Mohan et al 2009). Climate-driven changes in the nitrogen cycle have not routinely been considered in vegetation redistribution models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in addition to ways in which climate change will directly affect productivity, and presumably fitness, through temperature and moisture effects on growth conditions and habitat suitability (e.g. Mohan et al 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%