2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2021.103470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition and diversity patterns of deep sea benthic foraminifera from the Panama basin, eastern equatorial Pacific

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One aspect is currently known: foraminifera can use sponges as a habitat and as a food source. Besides, it is known, that for example currents can influence foraminiferal assemblages (Patarroyo and Martinez, 2013;Debenay et al, 2005) and further investigations are needed to clarify their potential impact on the diversity and abundance of foraminifera on sponges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One aspect is currently known: foraminifera can use sponges as a habitat and as a food source. Besides, it is known, that for example currents can influence foraminiferal assemblages (Patarroyo and Martinez, 2013;Debenay et al, 2005) and further investigations are needed to clarify their potential impact on the diversity and abundance of foraminifera on sponges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined morphotypes based on overall test shape and general chamber arrangement to focus analysis on the ecological structure of foraminiferal communities; although genera are often differentiated by characteristics including aperture types, wall structure, and ornamentation features, test shapes are closely related to the sedimentary environment the foraminifer occupies (Bernhard 1986; Corliss and Chen 1988; Murray et al 2011; Table 1). We used morphotype definitions from Patarroyo and Martinez (2021), Koutsoukos and Hart (1990), and Corliss and Chen (1988) to create a list of consensus morphotypes: branching, spherical, milioline, concave-convex, discoidal, plano-convex, biconvex, flat-tapered, cylindrical-tubular, and cylindrical-tapered (Table 1); and we assigned genera to morphotypes based on plates from Eicher and Worstell (1970) and Tappan and Loeblich (1988). We chose not to differentiate between agglutinated taxa and calcareous taxa, although they are often assigned separate morphotypes (e.g., Reolid et al 2008), to avoid the influence of taphonomic biases (i.e., dissolution of calcareous specimens and breakage of agglutinated specimens), which can affect the ratio of agglutinated to calcareous benthic foraminifera.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the Eastern Equatorial Pacific (EEP) OMZ, cores JPC 9, KAMA 8, KAMA 12 and KAMA 14 were retrieved during the research expeditions AMADEUS, ME0005A, KNR 176-2, Y71-3, Y69-71, and PLDSII (Patarroyo and Martinez, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%