2015
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition and quality characteristics of carcasses from pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake on high- or low-energy diets1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
(160 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 2011 ) reported no line difference in ultimate pH, drip loss or colour coordinates of loin, but Arkfled et al . ( 2015 ) reported lower drip loss, colour scores, lean tissue a* and lipid content and greater moisture content in LRFI pigs in later generations of the same selection experiment.…”
Section: Genetics Of Residual Feed Intake and Impacts On Main Dimensimentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( 2011 ) reported no line difference in ultimate pH, drip loss or colour coordinates of loin, but Arkfled et al . ( 2015 ) reported lower drip loss, colour scores, lean tissue a* and lipid content and greater moisture content in LRFI pigs in later generations of the same selection experiment.…”
Section: Genetics Of Residual Feed Intake and Impacts On Main Dimensimentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Sensorial analyses in the INRA lines showed that the appearance of raw meat was significantly modified, but eating quality of loin was lowly affected by selection ( Figure 2 ) as reported for the ISU lines (Arkfled et al ., 2015 ), despite muscle metabolic responses to selection. Besides, a multidimensional analysis allowed the identification within the LRFI line of a sub-group of efficient pigs that exhibited both lean carcasses and satisfactory levels of technological and sensory meat quality (Supplementary Material S1, Faure et al , 2012).…”
Section: Genetics Of Residual Feed Intake and Impacts On Main Dimensimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in CBC profiles between the two lines have been published elsewhere [ 35 ]. At 107.0 ± 8.3 (mean ± standard deviation) days of age and 42.2 ± 7.2 kg of body weight (BW), 88 gilts and 78 barrows were randomly assigned to 12 mixed-line, mixed-sex finishing pens with electronic single-space feeders (FIRE, Osborne Industries Inc., Osborne, KS) for feed efficiency test, with 6 pens being randomly assigned to either of two diets: a high-fiber, low-energy diet (HFD) and a low-fiber, high-energy diet (LFD) [ 38 ]. The animals on feed efficiency test consisted of 21 barrows and 22 gilts from the low RFI line plus 14 barrows and 23 gilts from the high RFI line fed the HFD, and 23 barrows and 23 gilts from the low RFI line plus 20 barrows and 20 gilts from the high RFI line fed the LFD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of alternative feed resources (generally rich in fibers) that do not compete with food for humans is a challenge for the present and the future feeding strategies. However, interactions between RFI genotypes and these resources can affect body composition [ 7 , 8 ]. An integrated approach combining genetics and nutrition is then necessary to get a better understanding of the complex biology underlying RFI and associated responses [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%