2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition and structure of natural mixed-oak stands in northern and central Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the findings reported here, abandonment of former agricultural areas that lacked woody species prior to the cessation of management practices usually results in the development of dense, homogeneous secondary woodland stands characterized by uniform age structure and a low number of woody species [65][66][67]. Following the abandonment of a wood-pasture, however, a natural, secondary woodland developed that is characterized by diverse stand structure [68,69].…”
Section: Changing Woodland Usementioning
confidence: 72%
“…Compared with the findings reported here, abandonment of former agricultural areas that lacked woody species prior to the cessation of management practices usually results in the development of dense, homogeneous secondary woodland stands characterized by uniform age structure and a low number of woody species [65][66][67]. Following the abandonment of a wood-pasture, however, a natural, secondary woodland developed that is characterized by diverse stand structure [68,69].…”
Section: Changing Woodland Usementioning
confidence: 72%
“…These two plots have also a low degree of CC, 20 % in SA-4 and 10 % in SB-4, which corresponds to the minimum threshold in discriminating a forest according to FAO (2001). The amount of CWD is equal to 0.9 m 3 ha -1 in SA-4 (Table 2), below the threshold of 134 m 3 ha -1 found in sessile oak woodlands (Petritan et al, 2012), 91.4 and 214.2 m 3 ha -1 (Schnitzler & Borlea, 1998;Wijdeven, 2004) in mixed woods with beech; in SB-4 is equal to 1 m 3 ha -1 (Table 2), even this less than 65.4 m 3 ha -1 (Carvalho, 2011) and 83 m 3 ha -1 reported by Manning et al (2013). Both plots do not exceed the minimum threshold of 10 m 3 ha -1 , indicated by Vallauri (2005) for the forests of the Central-Southern Italy.…”
Section: Plotmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Concerning the species composition of the stand, the strong dominance of the three oak species was determinant in the tree layer (DBH  5 cm, 51% of stems, 94% of basal area, Table 1) in particular of in the thick class of the tree layer, where almost all admixing species were absent (relative density: 1% of stems, 1% of basal area, Table 4 between 58% and 83% (Carvalho, 2011). In North American dry-mesic oak stands the dominance of oak species is markedly lower in almost all cases compared to the Central European dry-mesic stands.…”
Section: Dominance Of Oak Species In the Canopy Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several stands in Europe are ceased to be managed from different reasons, like designation as conservation area, or economic considerations. Long-term research of the abandoned oak stands is crucial to provide useful information for the sustainable and close-to-nature forest management of oak dominated forests of Europe (Rahman et al 2008), active conservation supporting their structural and functional complexity and maintaining biodiversity (Carvalho 2011, Petritan et al 2013, and understanding of natural disturbance regimes and natural shifts in their tree composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation