Composition of inventor teams and technological progress – The role of collaboration between academia and industry

Dornbusch, Friedrich; Neuhäusler, Peter

doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.003

Cited by 53 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Similarly, R&D-intensive firms collaborate with leading universities over long geographical distances, while for less-R&D-intensive firms, geographical proximity is important for university interaction (Laursen et al, 2011). Moreover, in collaborations with scientists, geographical proximity seems to be more important for small firms than large firms (Slavtchev, 2013;Dornbusch and Neuhäusler, 2015).…”

Section: U-i Technology Transfer and The Rationale For A Proximity Pementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Geographical proximity facilitates face-to-face interaction and improves the likelihood and success of U-I collaborations (Broström, 2010;Capaldo and Petruzzelli, 2014;Slavtchev, 2013;Dornbusch and Neuhäusler, 2015). Furthermore, several studies have highlighted the importance of non-spatial dimensions of proximity, such as cognitive, organizational, and social dimensions (D'Este et al, 2013;Nooteboom et al, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach

Villani

Rasmussen

Grimaldi

2017

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

256

143

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: U-i Technology Transfer and The Rationale For A Proximity Pementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach

Villani

Rasmussen

Grimaldi

2017

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

256

143

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…First, CWRO can be the main source of innovative product development, as firms can collaborate to access research organizations' scientific development and specialized knowledge to create innovative products (Dornbusch and Neuhäusler 2015;Klevorick et al 1995;Subramanian et al 2013). Second, CWRO provides an environment in which firms can better manage spillovers (Belderbos et al 2004;Cassiman and Veugelers 2002) to reduce outgoing spillovers while increasing incoming spillovers (Amir et al 2003;Martin 2002).…”

Section: Background and Hypotheses 21 Collaboration With Research Ormentioning

confidence: 99%

When should a firm collaborate with research organizations for innovation performance? The moderating role of innovation orientation, size, and age

Lee

2016

J Technol Transf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Little is known about the conditions strengthening or weakening the impact of a firm's collaboration with research organizations on innovation performance. Thus, this study uses a sample of 542 manufacturing firms in Korea to examine how innovation orientation and firm size and age as internal characteristics influence the relationship between collaboration with research organizations and innovation performance. The results show that collaboration with research organizations has a positive impact on innovation performance. More importantly, this effect is stronger (weaker) for firms with a strong orientation toward exploration (exploitation). In addition, older or larger firms obtain greater benefits from collaboration with research organizations. This study contributes toward clarifying a firm's collaboration with research organizations.

show abstract

“…These papers suggest that the methods and systems currently available offer no possibilities to calculate a UIPS fair value, and provide recommendations for improving U-I partnerships. Furthermore, the currently available techniques and software packages are unable to optimise the selected criteria [23,37,38,42,43]. In other words, this means that the current methods and systems are not able to calculate the fair value of a UIPS under deliberation (for further discussion, also see [21,22,24,39,40,[44][45][46][47][48]).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Evaluation System for University–Industry Partnership Sustainability: Enhancing Options for Entrepreneurial Universities

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The concept of university-industry partnership sustainability (UIPS) stands for well-adjusted progress among key players from universities and industry by sustaining their welfare, both in the present and in the future. This paper sought to develop an evaluation system for UIPS. The need for such a system is justified at three levels: the micro level (i.e., research and innovation performance, transfer and absorptive capability, and technology development), the meso level (i.e., institutional arrangements, communication networks, and local and indigenous rules) and the macro level (i.e., supply and demand, regulations, financing, taxes, culture, traditions, market, climate, politics, demographics, and technology). The UIPS evaluation system developed in this study offers the possibility of calculating a fair value of UIPS and providing recommendations for improving university-industry (U-I) partnerships. This can be of great importance for entrepreneurial universities that would like to strengthen their corporate links and/or reduce/reverse the "hollowing effect" of globalisation in disadvantaged regions. Additionally, this paper also contains discussions on the advantages, limitations, and managerial implications of this proposal.

show abstract

Composition of inventor teams and technological progress – The role of collaboration between academia and industry

Cited by 53 publications

References 57 publications

How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach

How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach

When should a firm collaborate with research organizations for innovation performance? The moderating role of innovation orientation, size, and age

An Evaluation System for University–Industry Partnership Sustainability: Enhancing Options for Entrepreneurial Universities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About