2010
DOI: 10.1149/1.3465646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compositional Improvement of Ln[sub 0.435]Ba[sub 0.145]Sr[sub 0.4]Fe[sub 0.8]Co[sub 0.2]O[sub 3−δ] IT-SOFC Cathodes Performance by Multiple Lanthanide Substitution

Abstract: A series of materials based on the perovskite Ln 0.435 Ba 0.145 Sr 0.4 Fe 0.8 Co 0.2 O 3−␦ system ͑Ln = La 1−x−y Pr x Sm y ͒ has been characterized as intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell ͑IT-SOFC͒ cathodes. Among the different La, Pr, and Sm combinations, those containing at a time Sm and La or alternatively Pr and La show the lowest polarization resistance values. Within the same substitution degree, praseodymium-based compositions have lower electrode resistance than samarium-based ones. Promising… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been observed for high-temperature proton conductor-based cells employing both thick electrolytes 17 and thin supported electrolytes 28,29 and this behavior is in contrast with the inverse behavior widely reported for conventional (oxide-ion based) SOFC electrolytes. 30,31 This fact is not clearly understood although this may be related to two possible effects: (1) the activation of surface species through an imposed current/DC bias, which typically affects conventional SOFC cathodes while the nature of the partial electrode reactions is different for both types of SOFCs, and (2) the drop in the local concentration of hydrogen in the anode through the dilution with the formed water in conventional SOFC cells which causes a slight decrease in the cell voltage (Nernst potential) whereas this effect does not take place in the PC-SOFC anode.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Electrolyte Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been observed for high-temperature proton conductor-based cells employing both thick electrolytes 17 and thin supported electrolytes 28,29 and this behavior is in contrast with the inverse behavior widely reported for conventional (oxide-ion based) SOFC electrolytes. 30,31 This fact is not clearly understood although this may be related to two possible effects: (1) the activation of surface species through an imposed current/DC bias, which typically affects conventional SOFC cathodes while the nature of the partial electrode reactions is different for both types of SOFCs, and (2) the drop in the local concentration of hydrogen in the anode through the dilution with the formed water in conventional SOFC cells which causes a slight decrease in the cell voltage (Nernst potential) whereas this effect does not take place in the PC-SOFC anode.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Electrolyte Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the Co dopant is also introduced in the B position together with the Pr, Ea is slightly reduced (1.44 eV). For this reason the best electrochemical properties are achieved for the LPNC cathode, which behaves somewhat better at low temperatures than the LPN electrode.The better performance of the doped compounds could be linked to the higher total conductivity and the reported catalytic effect of Co and Pr on oxygen reduction electrocatalysts[40,41].The impedance spectra recorded at 750 ºC in wet air for the three cathodes sintered at 1150 ºC are represented inFigure 8aand b (Nyquist and Bode plots, respectively). One or two different contributions (one or two separated arcs) can be distinguished.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of the relaxation frequencies of each process as a function of the electrode composition allows understanding 1 the changes of the different contributions to the total polarization resistance. The comparatively most performing electrode La 0.85 Sr 0.15 Cr 0.9 Ni 0.1 O 3-δ is mostly controlled by low frequencies (LF)processes, presumably ascribed to surface processes[45,46,47]. The worst electrode LaCr 0.9 Ni 0.1 O 3-δ shows(Figure 9) a much less important contribution of LF processes and is principally limited by medium frequencies (MF) processes, which might be related to coupled ion transport thorough the electrode bulk and reaction processes[48,49,50,51], as expected from the limited ionic conductivity of this compound.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%