Artificial Intelligence for the Internet of Everything 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-817636-8.00013-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compositional Models for Complex Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graphs of models are representable in the broader hypergraph category, which enables of model analysis, composition, comparison, and utilization [15]. Representing a system as a category with component types and inter-component relations as morphisms, with Ologs (knowledge representation structures that capture non-mathematical, freely-defined relations among objects as morphisms) to specify design constructs, current-state situations, constraints, and requirements [51,52] Iterative co-design of electro-mechanical functions in a cyber-physical system architecture [53][54][55][56] hierarchical requirements engineering, gradually evolving a system architecture; formal and verifiable system design [57][58][59] Structural and functional composition of system models [60] Using operads-categorical structures that map multi-object compositions to a single object-for hierarchical decomposition, design synthesis, separation of syntax from semantics, and semantic reasoning about complex systems [61,62] Model-Driven Software Engineering…”
Section: Applications Of Category Theory In Systems Engineering Analysis and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphs of models are representable in the broader hypergraph category, which enables of model analysis, composition, comparison, and utilization [15]. Representing a system as a category with component types and inter-component relations as morphisms, with Ologs (knowledge representation structures that capture non-mathematical, freely-defined relations among objects as morphisms) to specify design constructs, current-state situations, constraints, and requirements [51,52] Iterative co-design of electro-mechanical functions in a cyber-physical system architecture [53][54][55][56] hierarchical requirements engineering, gradually evolving a system architecture; formal and verifiable system design [57][58][59] Structural and functional composition of system models [60] Using operads-categorical structures that map multi-object compositions to a single object-for hierarchical decomposition, design synthesis, separation of syntax from semantics, and semantic reasoning about complex systems [61,62] Model-Driven Software Engineering…”
Section: Applications Of Category Theory In Systems Engineering Analysis and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… A requirement model is sound if joint validity entails external validity, corresponding to the dashed arrow above. With some work, one can show that these diagrams form the operations in an operad of entailments Ent ; see ([21], 6) for a similar construction. The intuition is quite clear There is a functor Context:Entfalse→boldRboldeboldl×, which extracts the relation across the bottom row of each entailment.…”
Section: Functorial Systems Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, category theory is effective in describing hybrid systems [48], [51], [52] and more recently there has been successful work in modeling and analysis of CPS using category theory [11], [53], [54], [55]. An important motivation for developing a categorical modeling security framework is the theory of co-design, a way of dealing with abstraction and refinement in models, which has recently been applied categorically to robotics [56] and control system design [57].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%