“…The apparent lack of coeval isolated carbonate platform field outcrop analogues, exhibiting laterally and vertically traceable facies belts at a kilometre scale, led to the use of land‐attached or non‐coeval isolated platforms for comparison. Thus, analogies are either made to well‐studied Palaeozoic high relief, flat‐top and steep slope platforms, such as the Devonian Great Barrier Reef of the Canning Basin (Playford, ; Playford et al ., , ; George et al ., ; Copp, ; Webb, ; Stephens & Sumner, ; Kerans & Harris, ; Chow et al ., ; among others), the Carboniferous Sierra del Cuera of northern Spain (Bahamonde et al ., ,b, , ; Della Porta et al ., ,b, , , , ; Kenter et al ., ; Della Porta, ; Verwer et al ., ), the Palaeozoic platforms of the Bolshoi Karatau (Cook et al ., ) and the Permian Capitan System of the USA (Borer & Harris, ; Kirkland et al ., ; Tinker, ; Hunt & Fitchen, ; Osleger & Tinker, ; publications in Saller et al ., ; Hunt et al ., ; Playton, ; Standen et al ., ; Van der Kooij et al ., ; among others), or to late Cainozoic isolated platforms, such as the Bahamas Islands (Mullins, ; Eberli & Ginsburg, ; Wilber et al ., ; publications in Ginsburg, ; Rankey, ; Harris et al ., ; Reijmer et al ., ). Among the cited examples, and in certain areas such as foreland basins and tilted blocks, the tectonic influence makes it difficult to discriminate among the factors controlling the sedimentary rock record (e.g.…”