1995
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00087-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compound chondrules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
216
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
9
216
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The another spinel-bearing chondrule, AL95-2-1-CDL.1 (abbreviated to CDL hereafter), can be classified as an independent (members of a set having significantly different textures and=or compositions [8]) and a consorting (one subequal to the other in size and shape [8]) compound chondrule (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The another spinel-bearing chondrule, AL95-2-1-CDL.1 (abbreviated to CDL hereafter), can be classified as an independent (members of a set having significantly different textures and=or compositions [8]) and a consorting (one subequal to the other in size and shape [8]) compound chondrule (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is known as compound chondrules and has been observed in chondritic meteorites in actuality. The abundance of compound chondrules relative to single chondrules is about a few percents at most Gooding & Keil, 1981;Wasson et al, 1995). The abundance sounds rare, however, this is much higher comparing with the collision probability of chondrules in the early solar gas disk, where number density of chondrules is quite low (Gooding & Keil, 1981;Sekiya & Nakamura, 1996).…”
Section: Comparison With Chondrule Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compound chondrules are exceedingly difficult to find and characterize using 2-D petrographic (thin section) methods (Wasson et al 1995;Ciesla et al 2004). However, in the 3-D tomographic images, compound chondrules can be identified in CR chondrites due to the high contrast between metal on chondrule rims and adjacent matrix (Hertz et al 2003;Hylton et al 2005).…”
Section: Compound Chondrules: Products Of Nebula Collisions or Parentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the resolution of tomography, it is not clear whether this pair has a septum of fine-grained matrix trapped between them. Wasson et al (1995) established the criterion that trapped dust (matrix) between chondrules in a compound pair indicates that the pair formed on a parent body, not by collision between the two chondrules freely floating in space. Using tomographic images, we were able to cut this pair precisely to expose the dust septum between them (BSE image in Fig.…”
Section: Compound Chondrules: Products Of Nebula Collisions or Parentmentioning
confidence: 99%