2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-009-0021-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compound perpendicular transport of charged particles with drift, advection, wave propagation effects, and an arbitrary turbulence spectrum

Abstract: We investigate compound diffusion of charged particles by employing a Chapman-Kolmogorov approach. The particle mean square deviation across the mean field is calculated for early and late times. By taking into account particle drift, advection, wave propagation effects, and an arbitrary turbulence spectrum at large turbulence scales, we achieve a more realistic description of compound diffusion in comparison to previous articles. Due to drift, advection, and wave propagation effects we find a diffusive behavi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The D D  ratio may depend on the particle velocity and the turbulence energy level (Zank et al 2004;Li et al 2012, and references therein). Shalchi et al (2009) have considered a compound diffusion of charged particles in the solar wind at the high turbulence level, taking into account particle drift, advection and wave propagation effects. Their results indicate that perpendicular mean free path may increase as the proton energy decreases below ∼300 MeV (their Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The D D  ratio may depend on the particle velocity and the turbulence energy level (Zank et al 2004;Li et al 2012, and references therein). Shalchi et al (2009) have considered a compound diffusion of charged particles in the solar wind at the high turbulence level, taking into account particle drift, advection and wave propagation effects. Their results indicate that perpendicular mean free path may increase as the proton energy decreases below ∼300 MeV (their Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors believe that FLRW is the main mechanism responsible for cross-field transport of charged cosmic particles. At least for situations in which particles follow magnetic field lines, the perpendicular transport parameters can directly be related to field line diffusion coefficients (see, for example, Webb et al 2006;Shalchi and Kourakis 2007c;Shalchi et al 2007Shalchi et al , 2009aWebb et al 2008;Weinhorst et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose in the theory of FLRW is to compute field line diffusion coefficients κ F L and field line mean square displacements (MSD's) ( x) 2 . The knowledge of these parameters is important for understanding fundamental properties of magnetic turbulence and the propagation of cosmic rays through the interplanetary or interstellar system (see, for example, Webb et al 2006Webb et al , 2008Shalchi and Kourakis 2007c;Shalchi et al 2007Shalchi et al , 2009aWeinhorst et al 2008). Field line wandering or random walk has been investigated in numerous papers (see, e.g., Jokipii and Parker 1969;Lerche 1973;Matthaeus et al 1995;Zimbardo et al 1995Zimbardo et al , 2000Ruffolo et al 2006;Shalchi andKourakis 2007a, 2007b;Shalchi and Weinhorst 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result for κ F is similar to that of Chuvilgin and Ptuskin (1993), who studied particle transport in a random magnetic field, with multiple scales (in their case the effective bulk velocity can be identified with the Alfvén speed plus an effective drift speed). Shalchi et al (2009a) explore the role of field line random walk and advection, drifts and wave propagation effects on the cross-field transport of particles, with similar results to this paper. They give an extensive description of the statistics of the field line random walk…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…x 2 ∝ | z| α for the second moment for slab plus 2D turbulence and concentrate on the second moment of the pdf P ⊥ . Our paper concentrates more on a generalized form of the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation for cross-field transport and a detailed description of P ⊥ not addressed by Shalchi et al (2009a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%