1972
DOI: 10.1016/0023-9690(72)90021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compound tests for excitation in early acquisition and after prolonged extinction of conditioned suppression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

20
91
1
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
20
91
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data of primary interest are presented in Figure 2d, which illustrates responding during the final extinction trials and test for spontaneous recovery of responding conducted 4 weeks later. As predicted by the work of Reberg (1972), data shown in Figure 2d, the final extinction day, responding to the single stimulus (Y) remained low, whereas responding to the compound (AX) was higher. Critically, the pattern reversed at test where responding to the stimulus that had been presented as part of the compound (X) was low and responding to the stimulus extinguished alone (Y) increased.…”
Section: Compound Stimulus Extinction Reduces Spontaneous Recovery Ofsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data of primary interest are presented in Figure 2d, which illustrates responding during the final extinction trials and test for spontaneous recovery of responding conducted 4 weeks later. As predicted by the work of Reberg (1972), data shown in Figure 2d, the final extinction day, responding to the single stimulus (Y) remained low, whereas responding to the compound (AX) was higher. Critically, the pattern reversed at test where responding to the stimulus that had been presented as part of the compound (X) was low and responding to the stimulus extinguished alone (Y) increased.…”
Section: Compound Stimulus Extinction Reduces Spontaneous Recovery Ofsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These data are illustrated in Figure 2b as the mean response rates for the stimuli that would subsequently be presented as either single or compound during extinction. Reberg (1972) noted that even when two stimuli have themselves been extinguished individually, presenting them Mean lever presses performed per 30 s stimulus or in the 30 s pre-stimulus interval on the final acquisition day for rats in the saline or atomoxetine groups; note that atomoxetine was given 45 min prior to the third extinction session. *Responding during the stimuli was significantly greater than during the pre-stimulus interval and^responding during the stimuli was not different between groups.…”
Section: Compound Stimulus Extinction Reduces Spontaneous Recovery Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During reacquisition training, savings is apparent because relearning occurs much faster than original learning (Frey and Ross, 1968;Napier et al, 1992). The existence of savings is among the evidence supporting the notion that extinction training leaves behind residual excitatory strength (Reberg, 1972;Schactman et al, 1985;Kehoe, 1988). Here we present evidence for this residual-plasticity hypothesis in eyelid conditioning and characterize basic mechanisms involved in the savings observed with this form of motor learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…27,28 Thus, reinstatement seems to depend on context conditioning and is likely to involve summation of two fear-inducing tendencies, each behaviorally subthreshold when considered independently, but suprathreshold when combined (cf. Hendry 29 and Reberg 30 ): weak conditioning to context and residual net excitation to the extinguished CS. Other context-dependent mechanisms may contribute as well.…”
Section: Behavioral and Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%