1966
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1966.10883364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehension of Connected Meaningful Discourse as a Function of Rate and Mode of Presentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results of this study suggest a progressive decline in comprehensive listening effectiveness with increases in compression, further substan- tiated by trend analysis indicating a strong linear relationship. These findings are in line with those of Jester andTravers (1966), Carver (1973), and Beatty et al (1980). Hypotheses two and three were also supported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the results of this study suggest a progressive decline in comprehensive listening effectiveness with increases in compression, further substan- tiated by trend analysis indicating a strong linear relationship. These findings are in line with those of Jester andTravers (1966), Carver (1973), and Beatty et al (1980). Hypotheses two and three were also supported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Also, as discussed earlier, the informationprocessing perspective of listening provides justification for hypothesizing a linear relationship between degree of time compression and comprehensive listening proficiency. It is a perspective supported by empirical findings that question the speech rate threshold effect (batty et al, 1980;Carver, 1973;Jester & Travers, 1966). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Jester (1966) reported such differences with presentation rates as high as 5 words/sec (wps), and Pfafflin (1974), as high as 10 wps. Using a presentation rate of 16 wps, Forster and his colleagues found advantages in immediate recall for sentences vs. random word strings (Forster, 1970), for semantically normal vs. anomalous sentences (Forster & Ryder, 1971), and for one-clause vs. two-clause sentences (Forster, 1970).…”
Section: Rapid Presentation Of Sentence Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the auding and reading comprehension scores are quite similar, and that both auding and reading scores decrease with increasing rates of presentation. Jester and Travers (1966) presented passages for auding and reading at rates of 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350 wpm. For auding, their college students had mean retention comprehension raw scores of 14.7, 14.2, 7.3, 4.9, and 5.2 respectively.…”
Section: Literature Related To Hypotheses From the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%