2019
DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehension of Legal Language by Adults With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract: Adults with TBI underperformed their uninjured peers in both accuracy and speed on a task of legal-language comprehension, and these differences were attributable in part to differences in working memory and reading fluency. Results highlight the potential costs of TBI-related communication problems in criminal proceedings and the need to formally evaluate language comprehension in individuals with TBI who are in the criminal justice system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deficits in this area can lead to difficulty attending to the trial process and communicating with legal personnel. Indeed, reduced processing speed, working memory, and verbal fluency have been linked to impaired accuracy and speed of comprehending legal social-exchange rules and written legal language among individuals with a history of moderate-severe TBI (Wszalek & Turkstra, 2019a, 2019b). Legal communication deficits have obvious implications for participation in rapid court proceedings, effective legal decision-making, and waiving Miranda rights.…”
Section: Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deficits in this area can lead to difficulty attending to the trial process and communicating with legal personnel. Indeed, reduced processing speed, working memory, and verbal fluency have been linked to impaired accuracy and speed of comprehending legal social-exchange rules and written legal language among individuals with a history of moderate-severe TBI (Wszalek & Turkstra, 2019a, 2019b). Legal communication deficits have obvious implications for participation in rapid court proceedings, effective legal decision-making, and waiving Miranda rights.…”
Section: Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These challenges may influence how an individual behaves and concurrently, how their behavior is perceived. For example, cognitive sequelae, such as memory and attention deficits may result in an individual not remembering rules, not responding, or being slow to respond to directions ( 14 ); forgetting an appointment, event, or conversation ( 15 ); or having difficulty articulating their thoughts and comprehending court and criminal proceedings ( 16 ). These behaviors may be misconstrued and viewed as defiant or uncooperative, leading to disciplinary actions by CJS staff ( 14 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These challenges experienced by individuals with a history of TBI can be long-lasting and can impact their interactions with the CJS [ 11 ], including increased likelihood of reoffending compared to individuals without a TBI [ 12 15 ]. For example, TBI may result in memory challenges (e.g., forgetting details of an event, conversation, or appointments) [ 16 ], difficulties in expressing thoughts and understanding the language used in court and criminal proceedings [ 17 ], and behaviours that are often viewed as defiant or uncooperative (e.g., not being able to focus or respond to directions, not understanding or remembering rules and inadvertently violating them, or slow verbal and physical responses that may be interpreted as uncooperative behaviour) [ 11 ]. If unaddressed, TBI and sequalae of TBI may lead to a cycle of reincarceration and recidivism [ 14 , 15 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%