Comprehension of Pictorial Symbols: Effects of Context and Test Method

Abstract

This research examined two factors involved in the evaluation of pictorial symbol comprehension: context (absence vs. presence of photographs depicting the probable environments where a symbol would be seen) and test method (multiple-choice with less vs. more plausible distractor alternatives vs. open-ended). We tested 33 pictorial symbols from various sources. The results showed that the multiple-choice test with less plausible distractors inflated comprehension scores by an average of 30% compared with the other two tests, which did not differ. The presence of context increased symbol comprehension in the open-ended test and in the multiple-choice test that had more plausible distractors. Extensive preliminary procedures demonstrated the difficulty of forming a multiple-choice test with plausible distractor alternatives. This fact, combined with multiple-choice tests′ low ecological validity in reflecting the real-world task of symbol comprehension, suggests that this test should be avoided in favor of an open-ended testing procedure. It is suggested that context provides ecologically valid cues that limit the range of possible constructs that the pictorial symbol could be, raising comprehension scores. The use of context may help reduce the costs (money, time, effort) of producing pictorial symbols with acceptable, above-criterion comprehension levels.

Lisbon Symbol Database (LSD): Subjective norms for 600 symbols

“…Few symbols are universally understood, and usually some learning of the correct interpretation is required (Tijus et al, 2007). Moreover, the interpretation of a particular symbol may not be independent of the context (see, e.g., Cahill, 1975;Wolff & Wogalter, 1998). For example, the symbol of a key (S511) in a shopping mall could indicate the location of a key-duplicating store, whereas in a computer it may indicate the need for a password.…”

Comprehensibility of Newly Introduced Water-sport Prohibitive Signs in Korea by Koreans and Westerners

“…The decision to let participants speak out the meaning of the signs in their own words (open-ended) rather than using multiple-choice options was made because this approach has been proven to yield greater ecological validity (Wolff and Wogalter, 1998;Ou and Yung, 2012). One sign was displayed at once on the computer screen.…”

Pokémon Go Warnings: Will they Work?

“…A critical confusion error is one that can lead to a misinterpretation of the icon. 21 For example, if there is a slash through a hand, which is a standard symbol indicating "do not enter", and then it is conceivable that an interpretation could be "do not touch".…”