2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehension of relevance implicatures by pre-schoolers: The case of adjectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The children had no trouble interpreting filler sentences with evaluative adjectives (e.g. That one I find very ugly), which is not surprising in view of earlier findings that even 2-year-old toddlers are able to understand sentences with evaluative adjectives as indirect requests (for positive items) or refusals (for negative items) (Tribushinina 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The children had no trouble interpreting filler sentences with evaluative adjectives (e.g. That one I find very ugly), which is not surprising in view of earlier findings that even 2-year-old toddlers are able to understand sentences with evaluative adjectives as indirect requests (for positive items) or refusals (for negative items) (Tribushinina 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The paradigm of a shopping game was chosen, since it provides a felicitous argumentative context for interpreting indirect utterances as acceptance or refusal to buy a product. In this context, even 2-year-old toddlers were shown to be able to understand indirect utterances with evaluative adjectives (Tribushinina 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations