Comprehension of Wh‐Questions Precedes Their Production in Typical Development and Autism Spectrum Disorders

Abstract

Lay Abstract Children with autism produce few wh-questions, compared to their typically developing peers. It is unclear if this is because of social-pragmatic difficulties, or if they have not yet learned the grammar for asking wh-questions. If children do not know how to use grammatical rules to produce questions, they might simply repeat sentences that they have heard without completely understanding them first. We visited the homes of 15 children with autism and 18 typically developing children with similar language abilities, across a three-year period. At each visit, children watched a video that depicted an apple hitting a flower and keys hitting a book. The children were then shown the items side-by-side on the screen and the audio asked “what hit the flower?” and “what did the keys hit?” We filmed the children’s eye movements and analyzed how long they looked at the named item, compared to when they heard “where is the flower/keys?” At each visit, we also filmed a 30-minute mother-child play session and analyzed the types of questions that the children asked. Children with autism showed comprehension of wh-questions at a later age than typically developing children, but at a similar level of overall language development. Neither group produced wh-questions before they had demonstrated that they understood the underlying grammatical rules. Therefore, children with autism seem to process wh-questions in the same way as their typically developing peers, just at a later age. This paper discusses the implications of our findings for the language development of children with autism. Scientific Abstract Children with autism (ASD) rarely produce wh-questions (e.g., “What hit the book?”) in naturalistic speech. It is unclear if this is due to social-pragmatic difficulties, or if grammatical deficits are also involved. If grammar is impaired, production of wh-questions by rote memorization might precede comprehension of similar forms. In a longitudinal study, 15 children with ASD and 18 initially-language-matched typically developing toddlers were visited in their homes at four-month intervals across a three-year period. The wh-question task was presented via intermodal preferential looking. Silent ‘hitting’ events (e.g., an apple hitting a flower) were followed by test trials in which the apple and flower were juxtaposed on the screen. During test trials, subject-wh and object-wh-question audios were sequentially presented (e.g., “What hit the flower?”/”What did the apple hit?”). Control audios were also presented (e.g., “Where’s the apple/flower?”). Children’s eye movements were coded off-line, frame-by-frame. To show reliable comprehension, children should look longer to the named item (i.e., apple or flower) during the “where” questions, but less at the named item during the subject-wh and object-wh-questions. To compare comprehension to production, we coded 30-minute spontaneous speech samples drawn from mother-child interactions at each visit. Results indicated that comprehension of subject and object-wh-...

Parent Telegraphic Speech Use and Spoken Language in Preschoolers With ASD

“…In addition, approximately 30% of children with ASD may not develop meaningful spoken language by school age (Tager-Flusberg & Kasari, 2013); if clinical decisions are based on language production, these children may be exposed to telegraphic input in treatment for an extended period of time. This is concerning because some young children with ASD, like typically developing children, may be capable of understanding more complex aspects of language than they produce (Goodwin, Fein, & Naigles, 2012). Failing to consistently expose children to grammatical features of language presents the real possibility that they will not be learned, which may be particularly harmful for young children who already have trouble learning morphosyntactic features of language (Eigsti et al, 2007;Fey, 2008;McGregor et al, 2011).…”

Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking (IPL): Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism

“…3,14,21 Developmental differences are seen with the wh-question video, as TD children showed significant comprehension at 28 months of age, whereas significant comprehension was first found in children with ASD at 54 months of age. 10 Therefore, children with ASD are delayed in learning how to correctly interpret questions such as "What did the apple hit?" …”

“…Videos can be created to assess a wide range of specific components of linguistic knowledge, such as Subject-Verb-Object word order, wh-questions, and tense/aspect suffixes on verbs; videos can also assess principles of word learning such as a noun bias, a shape bias, and syntactic bootstrapping. 10,14,17,21,24 Videos include characters and speech that are visually and acoustically salient and well tolerated by children with ASD. …”

Is Grammar Spared in Autism Spectrum Disorder? Data from Judgments of Verb Argument Structure Overgeneralization Errors

“…Similarly, several researchers have found that, when given standard preferential-looking and elicited production tasks, English speaking children with ASD seem to acquire knowledge of SUBJECT VERB OBJECT word order in a similar way to typically-developing children (Naigles et al 2011;Naigles and Tovar 2012;Swensen et al 2007). Finally, Goodwin et al (2012) showed that when assessed on their comprehension of wh-questions (a particularly complex syntactic structure), children with ASD performed similarly to language-matched (though not age-matched) controls.…”