2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep04(2021)126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive analysis of beta decays within and beyond the Standard Model

Abstract: Precision measurements in allowed nuclear beta decays and neutron decay are reviewed and analyzed both within the Standard Model and looking for new physics. The analysis incorporates the most recent experimental and theoretical developments. The results are interpreted in terms of Wilson coefficients describing the effective interactions between leptons and nucleons (or quarks) that are responsible for beta decay. New global fits are performed incorporating a comprehensive list of precision measurements in ne… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
101
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…riety of studies of the SMEFT, for example, in electroweak processes [106][107][108][109][110][111], flavour physics [112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120], low-energy precision data [121][122][123], diboson measurements [124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131], at dimension 8 [87,88,[132][133][134][135][136] (where collider positivity constraints are particularly relevant [136][137][138][139][140]), and its connection with UV-complete models, both at tree-level [141][142][143][144][145][146][147] and one-loop [148][149][150]…”
Section: Jhep04(2021)279mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…riety of studies of the SMEFT, for example, in electroweak processes [106][107][108][109][110][111], flavour physics [112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120], low-energy precision data [121][122][123], diboson measurements [124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131], at dimension 8 [87,88,[132][133][134][135][136] (where collider positivity constraints are particularly relevant [136][137][138][139][140]), and its connection with UV-complete models, both at tree-level [141][142][143][144][145][146][147] and one-loop [148][149][150]…”
Section: Jhep04(2021)279mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a rapid development makes λ a powerful tool for searching for redBSM physics. By comparing first-principles calculations of gA to the experimental results for λ one thereby constraints the strength of possible BSM contributions that could modify g A , in particular the right-handed currents [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Jhep10(2021)053mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[212] reported a percent-level determination ofg A = −1.271(10) (7) and aimed for sub-percent precision in the near future [214]. Once the lattice precision reaches 10 −3 or above, it would be possible to search for signals of BSM physics, in particular the right-handed currents [41,44,215,216], by comparing the experimental measurement of λ and the SM prediction in the right hand side of Equation (133). Due to this reason, one needs to understand the difference between A γW and V γW .…”
Section: A γ W : Dr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes the top-row CKM unitarity one of the most promising avenues for the discovery of BSM physics , in addition to the muon g − 2 [52][53][54][55][56] and the Bdecay anomalies [57][58][59][60]. Meanwhile, the various correlation coefficients in the beta decay spectrum shape also provide powerful constraints to the Wilson coefficients of possible BSM couplings in the effective field theory (EFT) representation [41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%