2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13167-022-00279-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive analysis of spliceosome genes and their mutants across 27 cancer types in 9070 patients: clinically relevant outcomes in the context of 3P medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we performed the first characterization of the expression of various isoforms of two of these alternatively spliced genes— ADAM12 and MUC4 —in a metastatic cell line model. Our study supports previous efforts to analyze spliceosome genes in 9070 patients across 27 types of cancer within the context of 3PM medicine [ 18 ]. We have provided a detailed analysis of pre-selected genes that will develop the field of alternative splicing for biomarker discovery to help in establishing the concept of 3P medicine and making it clinically viable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, we performed the first characterization of the expression of various isoforms of two of these alternatively spliced genes— ADAM12 and MUC4 —in a metastatic cell line model. Our study supports previous efforts to analyze spliceosome genes in 9070 patients across 27 types of cancer within the context of 3PM medicine [ 18 ]. We have provided a detailed analysis of pre-selected genes that will develop the field of alternative splicing for biomarker discovery to help in establishing the concept of 3P medicine and making it clinically viable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Altered splicing machinery has been linked to cancer [ 12 ]. More than 90% of genes are alternatively spliced, and disturbances to this complex machinery could result in the initiation and progression of cancer [ 13 , 14 ] Molecular changes in splicing genes and altered ratios of abundance of splice variants have been associated with the occurrence, increased progression and adverse prognosis of many types of cancer, including colorectal, breast, prostate and blood cancer [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]). Therefore, studying the alternative splicing (AS) events happening in CRC would allow for the identification of biomarkers that could be used for predictive diagnosis, prognosis, patient stratification and treatment selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Despite the extensive research devoted to investigating the pathophysiological mechanisms of this cancer, the precise etiology remains unknown. 35,36 Our study is grounded on single-cell RNA and highthroughput RNA sequencing data. We have discovered a potential anti-tumor immune mechanism involving the participation of TRIM28 in regulating immune cell infiltration, exhaustion, and the activity of the cGAS-STING pathway in CRPC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We merged the data of ALL patients in Phases I, II and III, and then excluded the following datasets: 1) duplicate patients with training cohort; 2) not BM sample; 3) without follow-up time; 4) unknown death or not; and 5) without detail clinical characteristic. The calculation of immune score, stromal score and tumor purity by employing the ESTIMATE algorithm for all downloaded dataset was performed by a custom script of Python 3.9.5 (Python Software Foundation, Delaware, USA) and “estimate” R package of R software 4.0.5 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) [ 46 ]. The stromal and immune scores were calculated by perform single-sample gene set-enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) [ 47 , 48 ], and the tumor purity was calculated by using the following formula: ESTIMATE score represents the sum of stromal score and immune score [ 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heatmap and volcano plots were generated by the “ggplot2” and “pheatmap” R packages, respectively [ 50 ]. The identification of the common DEGs from the immune score and stromal score groups was processed by Python script [ 46 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%