11th IET International Conference on Developments in Power Systems Protection (DPSP 2012) 2012
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2012.0091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive and quantitative analysis of protection problems associated with increasing penetration of inverter-interfaced DG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This will result in the upstream protection device seeing less current, which could lead to reduced tripping times. In severe cases, it could completely blind the upstream protective device from seeing the fault . The test network was modeled with sequence networks for different types of faults and then simulated to provide a clear understanding of the occurrence of protection blinding.…”
Section: Protection Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This will result in the upstream protection device seeing less current, which could lead to reduced tripping times. In severe cases, it could completely blind the upstream protective device from seeing the fault . The test network was modeled with sequence networks for different types of faults and then simulated to provide a clear understanding of the occurrence of protection blinding.…”
Section: Protection Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power systems are based on 3‐phase networks, which differ significantly from single phase networks. Many of the identified challenges in distributed generation (DG) power system protection are based on balanced power systems, with balanced faults and single line representations of the power system . During asymmetrical faults, the current and voltage in the 3 phases will not be equal, and sequence network analysis is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fault current of IIDG is largely determined by its controlling and greatly constrained by the inverter. Thus, the impacts of IIDG on the protection system are considered less than that of ACDG [4,5]. In [6], the typical fault behavior of an inverter was represented by modeling a three wire inverter as two controlled current sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], some general conclusions about the impacts of IIDG on the overcurrent protection were obtained. In [4], the influence of fault level, fault location, inverter location and inverter capacity on sympathetic tripping of IIDG was analyzed based on a typical UK distribution system. In [5], the impact of increasing amounts of IIDG on the protection of distribution system was analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these problems are more evident when the DG considered are synchronous or induction machines, they are less serious when inverter based DG, which have limited contributions to fault currents, are considered [4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%