Handbook on the Neuropsychology of Traumatic Brain Injury 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0784-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the correlations between awareness, mood and psychosocial disability, and long-term outcomes following brain injury, it stands to reason that it is important to address these psychosocial variables when conducting a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation, particularly for the purpose of treatment planning (Bergquist et al, 2014). Assessment of mood and psychosocial functioning may be best acquired through a patient and family interview, which can be complemented by using standardized measures of psychological functioning.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the correlations between awareness, mood and psychosocial disability, and long-term outcomes following brain injury, it stands to reason that it is important to address these psychosocial variables when conducting a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation, particularly for the purpose of treatment planning (Bergquist et al, 2014). Assessment of mood and psychosocial functioning may be best acquired through a patient and family interview, which can be complemented by using standardized measures of psychological functioning.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the need for endocrine profiling and replacement in subjects with hypopituitarism deserves further attention, including the definition of criteria regarding indication of hormone replacement and evaluation of treatment efficacy (see [ 58 ]). The latter will require comprehensive cognitive and affective assessments of individuals using standardized and robust neuropsychological tests ([ 3 , 59 ]; cf. Table 1 and Table 2 ).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the multifactorial nature of TBI, it is imperative that an interdisciplinary approach is developed to improve clinical outcomes [ 59 , 60 ]. However, management and prognosis for patients with TBI-induced hypopituitarism are confounded by “the marked variability in type, location and degree of pathological changes following a TBI, as well as the equally ubiquitous variability in pre-morbid organic and psychological functioning …” [ 60 ].…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuropsihologijska (NP) procjena osoba nakon TOM već je dulji niz godina standardna praksa u dijagnostici, kao i nezaobilazna komponenta programa za rehabilitaciju osoba nakon TOM (Braun i sur., 2011;Girard i sur., 1996). U rehabilitacijskoj literaturi o ishodima TOM također postoji slaganje o važnosti kognitivnih oštećenja, pri čemu još od ranih istraživanja autori naglašavaju primjenu NP testova kao mjere tih oštećenja (Bergquist, Yutsis i Micklewright, 2014;Jennett i Bond, 1975;Jennett i sur.,1981;Mandleberg i Brooks, 1975). Prednost je takve procjene, budući da su testovi objektivni instrumenti, da je po definiciji preciznija i pouzdanija od navedenih globalnih i funkcionalnih mjera ishoda (Chu i sur., 2007;Dikmen, Machamer, Winn i Temkin, 1995;Hellawell i sur., 1999;Lannoo i sur., 2001;Mansour i Lajiness-O'Neill, 2015;Millis i sur., 2001;Spikman i sur., 1999) ( Pilski i Tršinski, 2019) ili pak kod testova poput TMT-a.…”
Section: Neuropsihologijski Testovi Kao Mjere Ishodaunclassified