Comprehensive conservation planning and ecological sustainability within the United States National Wildlife Refuge System

Schroeder, Richard L.

doi:10.1080/15487733.2008.11908013

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The FWS’ SMART criteria for evaluating prescriptions (Adamcik et al ) match the requirements of good adaptive management. But CCPs and other conservation plans generally fall far short of meeting the SMART criteria (Schroeder ). In 2013, the implementation team for FWS’ strategic vision recommended that revised CCPs adopt a broad scope and leave more details for step‐down planning (USFWS ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Learning from Conservation Planning for the U.S. National Wildlife Refuges

Meretsky

Fischman

2014

Conservation Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System has nearly completed its first round of unit-level, comprehensive conservation plans (CCPs) and will soon begin required revisions. Laws and policies governing refuge planning emphasize ecological integrity, landscape-scale conservation, and adaptive management. We evaluated 185 CCPs completed during 2005-2011, which cover 324 of 555 national wildlife refuges. We reviewed CCP prescriptions addressing 5 common conservation issues (habitat and game, nongame, imperiled, and invasive species) and 3 specialized topics (landscape-scale conservation, climate change, and environmental quality). Common conservation issues received prescriptions in >90% of CCPs. Specialized topics received more variable treatment. Prescriptions for aquatic connectivity, water quantity, and climate-change impacts increased over the study period. Except for climate change, direct actions were the most common type of management prescription, followed by plans or studies. Most CCPs stated a commitment to adaptive management and prescribed monitoring for common conservation objectives; other aspects of planning for adaptive management were often lacking, despite strong support for adaptive management in the conservation planning literature. To better address refuge-specific threats, we recommend that revised plans explicitly match identified refuge issues with prescriptions, particularly for under-represented concerns such as novel pests and pathogens. We recommend incorporating triggers into monitoring frameworks and specifying actions that will occur when threshold values are reached to improve support for adaptive management. Revised CCPs should better reflect work that refuges already undertake to extend conservation objectives beyond their borders and better engage with regional conservation efforts to continue this work. More thorough landscape-scale threat assessments and explicit prioritization of planned actions would further improve conservation effectiveness. Excellent examples of all recommended practices exist within the CCPs we examined; sharing best planning practices would improve planning efficiency within the refuge system.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Learning from Conservation Planning for the U.S. National Wildlife Refuges

Meretsky

Fischman

2014

Conservation Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Enhancing coexistence of mobile species in the cyclic competition system by wildlife refuge

Shen

et al. 2022

Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigate evolving dynamics of cyclically competing species on spatially extended systems with considering a specific region, which is called the “wildlife refuge,” one of the institutional ways to preserve species biodiversity. Through Monte-Carlo simulations, we found that the refuge can play not groundbreaking but an important role in species survival. Species coexistence is maintained at a moderate mobility regime, which traditionally leads to the collapse of coexistence, and eventually, the extinction is postponed depending on the competition rate rather than the portion of the refuge. Incorporating the extinction probability and Fourier transform supported our results in both stochastic and analogous ways. Our findings may provide valuable evidence to assist fields of ecological/biological sciences in understanding the presence and construction of refuges for wildlife with associated effects on species biodiversity.

show abstract

Quantile Equivalence to Evaluate Compliance With Habitat Management Objectives

Cade

Johnson

2011

Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Equivalence estimated with linear quantile regression was used to evaluate compliance with habitat management objectives at Arapaho National Wildlife Refuge based on monitoring data collected in upland (5,781 ha; n = 511 transects) and riparian and meadow (2,856 ha, n = 389 transects) habitats from 2005 to 2008. Quantiles were used because the management objectives specified proportions of the habitat area that needed to comply with vegetation criteria. The linear model was used to obtain estimates that were averaged across 4 y. The equivalence testing framework allowed us to interpret confidence intervals for estimated proportions with respect to intervals of vegetative criteria (equivalence regions) in either a liberal, benefit-of-doubt or conservative, fail-safe approach associated with minimizing alternative risks. Simple Boolean conditional arguments were used to combine the quantile equivalence results for individual vegetation components into a joint statement for the multivariable management objectives. For example, management objective 2A required at least 809 ha of upland habitat with a shrub composition ≥0.70 sagebrush (Artemisia spp.), 20–30% canopy cover of sagebrush ≥25 cm in height, ≥20% canopy cover of grasses, and ≥10% canopy cover of forbs on average over 4 y. Shrub composition and canopy cover of grass each were readily met on >3,000 ha under either conservative or liberal interpretations of sampling variability. However, there were only 809–1,214 ha (conservative to liberal) with ≥10% forb canopy cover and 405–1,098 ha with 20–30% canopy cover of sagebrush ≥25 cm in height. Only 91–180 ha of uplands simultaneously met criteria for all four components, primarily because canopy cover of sagebrush and forbs was inversely related when considered at the spatial scale (30 m) of a sample transect. We demonstrate how the quantile equivalence analyses also can help refine the numerical specification of habitat objectives and explore specification of spatial scales for objectives with respect to sampling scales used to evaluate those objectives.

show abstract

Comprehensive conservation planning and ecological sustainability within the United States National Wildlife Refuge System

Cited by 3 publications

References 16 publications

Learning from Conservation Planning for the U.S. National Wildlife Refuges

Learning from Conservation Planning for the U.S. National Wildlife Refuges

Enhancing coexistence of mobile species in the cyclic competition system by wildlife refuge

Quantile Equivalence to Evaluate Compliance With Habitat Management Objectives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About