Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BackgroundHeart failure (HF) is a common condition that imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems. We aimed to identify subgroups of patients with heart failure admitted to the ICU using routinely measured laboratory biomarkers.MethodsA large dataset (N = 1176) of patients with heart failure admitted to the ICU at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, USA, between June 1, 2001, and October 31, 2012, was analyzed. We clustered patients to identify laboratory phenotypes. Cluster profiling was then performed to characterize each cluster, using a binary logistic model.ResultsTwo distinct clusters of patients were identified (N = 679 and 497). There was a significant difference in the mortality rate between Clusters 1 and 2 (50 [7.4%] vs. 109 [21.9%], respectively, p < 0.001). Patients in the Cluster 2 were significantly older (mean [SD] age = 72.35 [14.40] and 76.37 [11.61] years, p < 0.001) with a higher percentage of chronic kidney disease (167 [24.6%] vs. 262 [52.7%], respectively, p < 0.001). The logistic model was significant (Log‐likelihood ratio p < 0.001, pseudo R2 = 0.746) with an area under the curve of 0.905. The odds ratio for leucocyte count, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), red blood cell (RBC) distribution width, hematocrit (HcT), lactic acid, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum potassium, magnesium, and sodium were significant (all p < 0.05).ConclusionLaboratory data revealed two phenotypes of ICU‐admitted patients with heart failure. The two phenotypes are of prognostic importance in terms of mortality rate. They can be differentiated using blood cell count, kidney function status, and serum electrolyte concentrations.
BackgroundHeart failure (HF) is a common condition that imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems. We aimed to identify subgroups of patients with heart failure admitted to the ICU using routinely measured laboratory biomarkers.MethodsA large dataset (N = 1176) of patients with heart failure admitted to the ICU at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, USA, between June 1, 2001, and October 31, 2012, was analyzed. We clustered patients to identify laboratory phenotypes. Cluster profiling was then performed to characterize each cluster, using a binary logistic model.ResultsTwo distinct clusters of patients were identified (N = 679 and 497). There was a significant difference in the mortality rate between Clusters 1 and 2 (50 [7.4%] vs. 109 [21.9%], respectively, p < 0.001). Patients in the Cluster 2 were significantly older (mean [SD] age = 72.35 [14.40] and 76.37 [11.61] years, p < 0.001) with a higher percentage of chronic kidney disease (167 [24.6%] vs. 262 [52.7%], respectively, p < 0.001). The logistic model was significant (Log‐likelihood ratio p < 0.001, pseudo R2 = 0.746) with an area under the curve of 0.905. The odds ratio for leucocyte count, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), red blood cell (RBC) distribution width, hematocrit (HcT), lactic acid, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum potassium, magnesium, and sodium were significant (all p < 0.05).ConclusionLaboratory data revealed two phenotypes of ICU‐admitted patients with heart failure. The two phenotypes are of prognostic importance in terms of mortality rate. They can be differentiated using blood cell count, kidney function status, and serum electrolyte concentrations.
Aims The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging based on resting assessments. Exercise echocardiography is often used to unmask abnormalities that develop during exercise, but the diagnostic criteria have not been standardized. This study aimed to elucidate how cardiologists utilize exercise echocardiography to diagnose HFpEF in real-world practice. Methods and results An international web-based survey involving 87 cardiologists was performed. We also performed a retrospective cross-sectional study to investigate the impact of different exercise echocardiographic diagnostic criteria in 652 dyspnoeic patients who underwent exercise echocardiography. The HFA-PEFF algorithm was the most commonly used exercise echocardiography criterion for HFpEF diagnoses (48%), followed by the ASE/EACVI criteria (24%) and other combinations of multiple parameters (22%). Among 652 patients, the proportion of HFpEF diagnosis varied substantially according to the criteria used ranging from 20.1% (ASE/EACVI criteria) to 44.3% (HFA-PEFF algorithm). Many cases (49.4–70.5%) remained indeterminate after exercise echocardiography, but only 41% of surveyed cardiologists would utilize exercise right heart catheterization to resolve an indeterminate result. Despite these diagnostic uncertainties, 54% of surveyed cardiologists would utilize exercise echocardiography results to initiate sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. Conclusion In real-world practice, exercise echocardiographic criteria utilized across cardiologists vary, which meaningfully impacts the frequency of HFpEF diagnoses, with indeterminate results being common. Despite these diagnostic uncertainties, many cardiologists initiate pharmacotherapy based on exercise echocardiography. The lack of consensus on universal diagnostic criteria for exercise echocardiography and approaches to indeterminate results may limit the delivery of evidence-based treatment for HFpEF.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.