2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/640736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive Evaluation of Energy Efficiency Based on TOPSIS for Protocols of Collaborative Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract: Comprehensive evaluation of energy efficiency of protocols under certain cost conditions is a relatively new and ill-defined concept for collaborative wireless sensor networks (CWSN). In this paper, multicriteria decision making (MCDM) theory is introduced into comprehensive evaluation of energy efficiency of clustering protocols, which is the predecessor of collaborative protocols. Parameters about energy efficiency of total network, including cost and benefit parameters, are selected to construct a metrics s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OCER and Extended OCER, by considering different parameters. In [17], researchers put forward a new neutrosophic‐based decision‐making technique with multiple‐parameter similarity combined with weight. In [18], a TDMA‐based routing protocol is given for improving the performance in terms of energy in WBAN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OCER and Extended OCER, by considering different parameters. In [17], researchers put forward a new neutrosophic‐based decision‐making technique with multiple‐parameter similarity combined with weight. In [18], a TDMA‐based routing protocol is given for improving the performance in terms of energy in WBAN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most suitable alternative should be closest to the positive ideal solution and the farthest from the negative ideal solution. At present, with the deepening realization about TOPSIS, some extended TOPSIS techniques have been used widely for MADM problems to overcome the vagueness in the judgments made by the assessors [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. In order to overcome the problem of index weight calculation, AHP is the main auxiliary method of TOPSIS, and fuzzy sets are introduced together to facilitate the quantification of the two pairs of indicators [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the ANP is the development and supplement of AHP. In addition, the method of comprehensive evaluation, principal component analysis, and other methods are all important methods to calculate weights, which are applied in TOPSIS [21][22][23]. On the other hand, the optimal or worst value for every attribute should be selected, and a quantitative measure method should be constructed to compare with each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%