2014
DOI: 10.5194/hess-18-1605-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive evaluation of water resources security in the Yellow River basin based on a fuzzy multi-attribute decision analysis approach

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, a fuzzy multi-attribute decision analysis approach (FMADAA) was developed for supporting the evaluation of water resources security in nine provinces within the Yellow River basin. A numerical approximation system and a modified left-right scoring approach were adopted to cope with the uncertainties in the acquired information. Also, four conventional multi-attribute decision analysis (MADA) methods were implemented in the evaluation model for impact evaluation, including simple weight… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the gray correlation method to calculate the weight of each rating index listed in Table 1. Using Equations (11) and (12), we then incorporated the matter-element R 2005 -R 2012 into the matter-element analysis model to evaluate index correlation degrees, factor layer correlation degrees, and comprehensive correlation degrees for the Guizhou region (Tables 2-4). For 2005, for example, the correlation degrees (k j (x 1 )) of the five corresponding grades are N o1 = −0.021, N o2 = 0.013, N o3 = 0.001, N o4 = 0.000, and N o5 = −0.014.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used the gray correlation method to calculate the weight of each rating index listed in Table 1. Using Equations (11) and (12), we then incorporated the matter-element R 2005 -R 2012 into the matter-element analysis model to evaluate index correlation degrees, factor layer correlation degrees, and comprehensive correlation degrees for the Guizhou region (Tables 2-4). For 2005, for example, the correlation degrees (k j (x 1 )) of the five corresponding grades are N o1 = −0.021, N o2 = 0.013, N o3 = 0.001, N o4 = 0.000, and N o5 = −0.014.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, water resource security has become a principal factor limiting economic and social development in China. To date, water security evaluations have focused on regions traditionally associated with water scarcity [9], such as the populous areas of Central and Eastern China [10,11], the arid northwest, and the Yellow River Basin [12]. In contrast, little attention has been paid to water availability in the country's humid, economically deprived southwestern areas, which includes China's famous karst region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, improving the efficiency of water resource use in agricultural production is an important way to relieve the pressure on China's overall water resources. Reasonable assessments of the demand by crops for water resources and the utilization of water resources in the production of crops can provide a theoretical basis for improving the management and regulation of agricultural water resources [2]. Compared to the traditional water use evaluation approach, the relatively new concept of the "water footprint" provides a framework to assess the impact of human production and consumption activities on water resources from the aspects of amounts, types, and utilization efficiency [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, data-driven methods such as fuzzy genetic (FG), artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) have been applied for modelling Epan (Sudheer et al, 2002;Kisi, 2009;Dogan et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2013;Kisi and Tombul, 2013;Malik and Kumar, 2015) and have been successfully applied in water resources (Moghaddamnia et al, 2009;Amini et al, 2010;Sanikhani et al, 2012;Kisi and Tombul, 2013;Liu et al 2014;Li et al 2015;Khan and Valeo, 2015;Xu et al, 2016). Sudheer et al (2002) used ANN in modelling Epan and compared with Stephens-Stewart (SS) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%