2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive expression-based isoform biomarkers predictive of drug responses based on isoform co-expression networks and clinical data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to previous isoform expression network analyses (Li et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2020), our analysis allows making a comparison of the degree to which orthologous isoforms display the same pattern of tissue bias across species. We identified 10 394 orthologous subgroups for which isoforms of the orthologous genes display a conserved tissue bias in at least two of the species analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to previous isoform expression network analyses (Li et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2020), our analysis allows making a comparison of the degree to which orthologous isoforms display the same pattern of tissue bias across species. We identified 10 394 orthologous subgroups for which isoforms of the orthologous genes display a conserved tissue bias in at least two of the species analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the extent to which AS regulation creates co-expression patterns among alternative isoforms from different genes has not yet been fully addressed. Specifically, previous studies tackling this type of isoform co-expression have either focused on specific event types, such as alternative 3' exons 84 , or solely on the identification of functionally-relevant alternative isoforms in different biological contexts 85,86 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining cleaned reads were aligned to the reference genome with HISAT2 (version 2.4) using “-rna-strandness RF” [ 55 ], and genes were assembled using StringTie (version 1.3.1) based on these mapped reads [ 56 ]. RSEM software was used to calculate gene expression values based on well-mapped reads and normalized to the fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped fragment (FPKM) values, as previously described [ 57 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%