2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-020-02832-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive high-speed reconciliation for continuous-variable quantum key distribution

Abstract: Reconciliation is currently the bottleneck of continuous-variable quantum key distribution systems for its great influence on the key rate and the distance of systems. In this paper, we address the increase in key rates by accelerating the speed of reconciliation algorithms based on the protocol of sliced error correction on a heterogeneous computing structure (a GPGPU card (general purpose graphics processing units will be abbreviated as GPU in this paper) and a general CPU) in the framework of Open Computing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we find for ǫ = 10 −9 , N = 10 9 and m = 5, the inequality 24 holds for any combination of the remaining parameters selected from the ranges V A ∈ [1,34], T ∈ [0, 1] and ξ = [0, 0.05]. 13 The values of ξ ch and ξ d in the standard CV-QKD settings are predicted values after accounting for all noise terms [17].…”
Section: B Optimised Ldpc Blocklength For Cv-qkd Reconciliationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, we find for ǫ = 10 −9 , N = 10 9 and m = 5, the inequality 24 holds for any combination of the remaining parameters selected from the ranges V A ∈ [1,34], T ∈ [0, 1] and ξ = [0, 0.05]. 13 The values of ξ ch and ξ d in the standard CV-QKD settings are predicted values after accounting for all noise terms [17].…”
Section: B Optimised Ldpc Blocklength For Cv-qkd Reconciliationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, through detailed numerical search we find that the inequality 24 holds for the range of parameters anticipated for realistic CV-QKD deployments. 12 For example, if we consider the following CV-QKD settings (in the following we refer to these as the standard CV-QKD settings); N = 10 9 , m = 5, ǫ EC = 2ǫ s = ǫ P A = ǫ P E = 2.5 × 10 −10 , V A = 5, T = 0.9, ξ ch = 0.0186 and ξ d = 0.0133 13 , we find that the LHS of the inequality is greater than 10 12 and the RHS of the inequality is less than 10 11 .…”
Section: B Optimised Ldpc Blocklength For Cv-qkd Reconciliationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently, Cardinal et al have proposed SEC which chooses a set of quantization functions to convert a continuous variable into binary-value slices and then executes error correction on the quantized slices [22], [23]. Soon after, many researchers apply code-modulated techniques including multilevel coding (MLC) and multistage decoding (MSD) in SEC with Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes to improve the reconciliation performance at high SNRs [33], [34]. The SEC scheme allows one to extract more than 1 bit of key from per pulse, especially at the high SNRs, but its quantization performance is poor at the low SNR of long-distance CV-QKD, which limits its secure distance to about 30 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If QBER is higher than the determined threshold, because of the nocloning theorem [10], it shows that Eve spoofs the connection and the key is not safe anymore. Otherwise, the next step is begun, 3-B uses a reconciliation algorithm [11][12][13][14][15][45][46][47] to correct the errors and then uses some privacy amplification methods [16,17] to remove the disclosed information along the reconciliation step. Key reconciliation is important because using an efficient approach with minimum information leakage, in addition to increase secure key generation rate, it impacts on the security of the communication between two sides.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%